BAOB
Price
$4.15
Change
+$0.13 (+3.23%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
24.05M
BDGSF
Price
$55.65
Change
-$12.55 (-18.40%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.92B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAOB vs BDGSF

Header iconBAOB vs BDGSF Comparison
Open Charts BAOB vs BDGSFBanner chart's image
Baraboo Bancorporation, Inc. (THE)
Price$4.15
Change+$0.13 (+3.23%)
Volume$218
Capitalization24.05M
Bank of Ga Group
Price$55.65
Change-$12.55 (-18.40%)
Volume$330
Capitalization1.92B
BAOB vs BDGSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BDGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAOB vs. BDGSF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAOB is a Hold and BDGSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BAOB: $4.15 vs. BDGSF: $55.65)
Brand notoriety: BAOB and BDGSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAOB: 12% vs. BDGSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BAOB: $24.05M vs. BDGSF: $1.92B
BAOB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $24.05M. BDGSF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAOB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBDGSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BAOB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BDGSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAOB and BDGSF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAOB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BDGSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAOB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • BDGSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAOB is a better buy in the short-term than BDGSF.

Price Growth

BAOB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.23% price change this week, while BDGSF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDGSF($1.92B) has a higher market cap than BAOB($24.1M). BAOB YTD gains are higher at: 23.892 vs. BDGSF (-8.108). BAOB has less debt than BDGSF: BAOB (8.1M) vs BDGSF (3.53B). BDGSF has higher revenues than BAOB: BDGSF (2.03B) vs BAOB (24.2M).
BAOBBDGSFBAOB / BDGSF
Capitalization24.1M1.92B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.892-8.108-295%
P/E RatioN/A3.38-
Revenue24.2M2.03B1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt8.1M3.53B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAOB vs BDGSF: Fundamental Ratings
BAOB
BDGSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4112
SMR RATING
1..100
538
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4862
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3549
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAOB's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as BDGSF (23). This means that BAOB’s stock grew similarly to BDGSF’s over the last 12 months.

BDGSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as BAOB (41). This means that BDGSF’s stock grew similarly to BAOB’s over the last 12 months.

BDGSF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAOB (53). This means that BDGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAOB’s over the last 12 months.

BAOB's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as BDGSF (62). This means that BAOB’s stock grew similarly to BDGSF’s over the last 12 months.

BAOB's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as BDGSF (49). This means that BAOB’s stock grew similarly to BDGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAOBBDGSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BDGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCBSX55.060.69
+1.27%
ClearBridge Select FI
RRGSX100.611.13
+1.14%
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock R
SJVIX30.170.21
+0.70%
Steward Large Cap Value I
IYSCX12.600.08
+0.64%
Macquarie Smid Cap Core Fund Class C
MVSSX30.750.18
+0.59%
Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value R6

BAOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BAOB and BKEAF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BAOB and BKEAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAOB
1D Price
Change %
BAOB100%
N/A
BKEAF - BAOB
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
TCBS - BAOB
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
SBNY - BAOB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDOUY - BAOB
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
BDGSF - BAOB
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BDGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDGSF has been loosely correlated with MTPOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDGSF jumps, then MTPOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDGSF
1D Price
Change %
BDGSF100%
N/A
MTPOY - BDGSF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PBKC - BDGSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBTT - BDGSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
SOBS - BDGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCAL - BDGSF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
More