BANFP
Price
$26.00
Change
+$0.10 (+0.39%)
Updated
Jul 7, 11:14 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
CLST
Price
$12.49
Change
+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BANFP vs CLST

Header iconBANFP vs CLST Comparison
Open Charts BANFP vs CLSTBanner chart's image
BancFirst
Price$26.00
Change+$0.10 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Catalyst Ban
Price$12.49
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Volume$300
Capitalization53.99M
BANFP vs CLST Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BANFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANFP vs. CLST commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANFP is a Hold and CLST is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BANFP: $25.90 vs. CLST: $12.48)
Brand notoriety: BANFP and CLST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANFP: 116% vs. CLST: 11%
Market capitalization -- BANFP: $0 vs. CLST: $53.99M
BANFP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. CLST’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $53.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANFP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLST’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BANFP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLST is a better buy in the long-term than BANFP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANFP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANFP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BANFP is a better buy in the short-term than CLST.

Price Growth

BANFP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.12% price change this week, while CLST (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLST YTD gains are higher at: 6.032 vs. BANFP (4.865).
BANFPCLSTBANFP / CLST
CapitalizationN/A54M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.8656.03281%
P/E RatioN/A84.57-
RevenueN/A9.14M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANFP vs CLST: Fundamental Ratings
BANFP
CLST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10011
SMR RATING
1..100
10084
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10050
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BANFP's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CLST (31). This means that BANFP’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

CLST's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BANFP (100). This means that CLST’s stock grew significantly faster than BANFP’s over the last 12 months.

CLST's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as BANFP (100). This means that CLST’s stock grew similarly to BANFP’s over the last 12 months.

CLST's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as BANFP (55). This means that CLST’s stock grew similarly to BANFP’s over the last 12 months.

CLST's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANFP (100). This means that CLST’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANFP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANFPCLST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
8%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BANFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JUTOY23.671.28
+5.72%
Jutal Offshore Oil Service Ltd.
AATV0.10N/A
N/A
Adaptive Ad Systems, Inc.
KANKF24.90N/A
N/A
Kaneka Corp.
WILLF41.75N/A
N/A
Demant AS
ETCC1.30-0.11
-7.80%
Environmental Tectonics Corp.

BANFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BANFP and IROQ have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BANFP and IROQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANFP
1D Price
Change %
BANFP100%
N/A
IROQ - BANFP
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
OPBK - BANFP
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
CLST - BANFP
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
ASRV - BANFP
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
PWOD - BANFP
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
More

CLST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLST has been loosely correlated with UBFO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLST jumps, then UBFO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLST
1D Price
Change %
CLST100%
-1.86%
UBFO - CLST
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
CARE - CLST
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
ACNB - CLST
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
NEWT - CLST
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
PNC - CLST
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More