BANF
Price
$116.86
Change
+$0.39 (+0.33%)
Updated
Feb 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.92B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FMBH
Price
$44.01
Change
-$0.24 (-0.54%)
Updated
Feb 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.06B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BANF vs FMBH

Header iconBANF vs FMBH Comparison
Open Charts BANF vs FMBHBanner chart's image
BancFirst
Price$116.86
Change+$0.39 (+0.33%)
Volume$357
Capitalization3.92B
First Mid Bancshares
Price$44.01
Change-$0.24 (-0.54%)
Volume$2.11K
Capitalization1.06B
BANF vs FMBH Comparison Chart in %
BANF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANF vs. FMBH commentary
Feb 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANF is a Buy and FMBH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 06, 2026
Stock price -- (BANF: $116.47 vs. FMBH: $44.25)
Brand notoriety: BANF and FMBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANF: 59% vs. FMBH: 154%
Market capitalization -- BANF: $3.92B vs. FMBH: $1.06B
BANF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.92B. FMBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMBH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BANF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FMBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMBH is a better buy in the long-term than BANF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANF’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMBH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANF’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FMBH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BANF is a better buy in the short-term than FMBH.

Price Growth

BANF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.90% price change this week, while FMBH (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANF is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.36% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BANF($3.92B) has a higher market cap than FMBH($1.06B). BANF has higher P/E ratio than FMBH: BANF (16.44) vs FMBH (11.49). FMBH YTD gains are higher at: 13.462 vs. BANF (9.857). BANF has more cash in the bank: 205M vs. FMBH (16.1M). BANF has less debt than FMBH: BANF (97.9M) vs FMBH (363M). BANF has higher revenues than FMBH: BANF (673M) vs FMBH (339M).
BANFFMBHBANF / FMBH
Capitalization3.92B1.06B371%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.85713.46273%
P/E Ratio16.4411.49143%
Revenue673M339M199%
Total Cash205M16.1M1,273%
Total Debt97.9M363M27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANF vs FMBH: Fundamental Ratings
BANF
FMBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1620
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3764
SMR RATING
1..100
1625
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6754
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BANF's Valuation (75) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (98). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (64). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (25). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANF (56). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to BANF’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANF (67). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to BANF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANFFMBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BANF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GWGZX20.530.11
+0.54%
AMG GW&K Small Mid Cap Core Z
NIEYX17.860.03
+0.17%
BNY Mellon International Equity Y
SNGRX26.72-0.17
-0.63%
Sit International Growth
PBLAX37.77-0.24
-0.63%
Principal Blue Chip A
MNDGX16.80-0.21
-1.23%
MFS New Discovery R1

BANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANF has been closely correlated with SBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANF jumps, then SBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANF
1D Price
Change %
BANF100%
+3.06%
SBSI - BANF
89%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
TCBK - BANF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
NBTB - BANF
88%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
FMBH - BANF
87%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
OCFC - BANF
86%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
More

FMBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBH
1D Price
Change %
FMBH100%
+1.03%
TCBK - FMBH
95%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
STBA - FMBH
94%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
UBSI - FMBH
93%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
BY - FMBH
92%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
CTBI - FMBH
92%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
More