BAND
Price
$15.68
Change
-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
460.53M
33 days until earnings call
GGAMF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.02 (+40.00%)
Updated
Dec 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.89M
Ad is loading...

BAND vs GGAMF

Header iconBAND vs GGAMF Comparison
Open Charts BAND vs GGAMFBanner chart's image
Bandwidth
Price$15.68
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Volume$121.1K
Capitalization460.53M
Good Gamer Entertainment
Price$0.07
Change+$0.02 (+40.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization2.89M
BAND vs GGAMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAND vs. GGAMF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAND is a Hold and GGAMF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BAND: $15.68 vs. GGAMF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: BAND and GGAMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAND: 50% vs. GGAMF: 61%
Market capitalization -- BAND: $460.53M vs. GGAMF: $2.89M
BAND [@Packaged Software] is valued at $460.53M. GGAMF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGGAMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GGAMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGAMF is a better buy in the long-term than BAND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAND’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BAND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BAND (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.00% price change this week, while GGAMF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAND is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAND($461M) has a higher market cap than GGAMF($2.89M). GGAMF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BAND (-7.873). BAND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 23.2M vs. GGAMF (-17.31M). BAND has more cash in the bank: 153M vs. GGAMF (757K). GGAMF has less debt than BAND: GGAMF (5K) vs BAND (645M). BAND has higher revenues than GGAMF: BAND (601M) vs GGAMF (932).
BANDGGAMFBAND / GGAMF
Capitalization461M2.89M15,946%
EBITDA23.2M-17.31M-134%
Gain YTD-7.8730.000-
P/E Ratio357.14N/A-
Revenue601M93264,484,979%
Total Cash153M757K20,211%
Total Debt645M5K12,900,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAND: Fundamental Ratings
BAND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X104462.0400004705.133000
+4.72%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA426.5012.68
+3.06%
Tesla
SPY597.585.94
+1.00%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.981.72
+0.75%
Apple
GME27.51-0.21
-0.76%
GameStop Corp

BAND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAND has been loosely correlated with FLYW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAND jumps, then FLYW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAND
1D Price
Change %
BAND100%
-0.06%
FLYW - BAND
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
APPN - BAND
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.93%
BIGC - BAND
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
DJCO - BAND
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
PCOR - BAND
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
More

GGAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGAMF has been loosely correlated with VENZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGAMF jumps, then VENZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGAMF
1D Price
Change %
GGAMF100%
N/A
VENZF - GGAMF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CXAI - GGAMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.29%
BAND - GGAMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
VRAR - GGAMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
SNAL - GGAMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+10.73%
More