BAND
Price
$14.09
Change
-$0.15 (-1.05%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
424.69M
73 days until earnings call
BRQSF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.01 (-6.25%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAND vs BRQSF

Header iconBAND vs BRQSF Comparison
Open Charts BAND vs BRQSFBanner chart's image
Bandwidth
Price$14.09
Change-$0.15 (-1.05%)
Volume$193.75K
Capitalization424.69M
Borqs Technologies
Price$0.15
Change-$0.01 (-6.25%)
Volume$14.31K
Capitalization4.35M
BAND vs BRQSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRQSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAND vs. BRQSF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAND is a Hold and BRQSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BAND: $14.09 vs. BRQSF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: BAND and BRQSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAND: 67% vs. BRQSF: 43%
Market capitalization -- BAND: $424.69M vs. BRQSF: $4.35M
BAND [@Computer Communications] is valued at $424.69M. BRQSF’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $4.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.87T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBRQSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BRQSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRQSF is a better buy in the long-term than BAND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAND’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BRQSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAND’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BRQSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAND is a better buy in the short-term than BRQSF.

Price Growth

BAND (@Computer Communications) experienced а +5.39% price change this week, while BRQSF (@Computer Communications) price change was -9.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAND is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+2.18% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAND($425M) has a higher market cap than BRQSF($4.35M). BAND YTD gains are higher at: -17.215 vs. BRQSF (-39.848).
BANDBRQSFBAND / BRQSF
Capitalization425M4.35M9,768%
EBITDA41.3MN/A-
Gain YTD-17.215-39.84843%
P/E RatioN/A0.27-
Revenue758MN/A-
Total Cash68.1MN/A-
Total Debt480MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAND vs BRQSF: Fundamental Ratings
BAND
BRQSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7987
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8595
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRQSF's Valuation (52) in the Miscellaneous industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAND (94) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that BRQSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAND’s over the last 12 months.

BRQSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as BAND (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that BRQSF’s stock grew similarly to BAND’s over the last 12 months.

BAND's SMR Rating (92) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as BRQSF (100) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that BAND’s stock grew similarly to BRQSF’s over the last 12 months.

BAND's Price Growth Rating (79) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as BRQSF (87) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that BAND’s stock grew similarly to BRQSF’s over the last 12 months.

BAND's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as BRQSF (95) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that BAND’s stock grew similarly to BRQSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANDBRQSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRQSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYHRX40.360.17
+0.42%
Rydex Real Estate H
NQGAX40.58N/A
N/A
Nuveen Global Equity Income A
HRLVX23.45-0.02
-0.09%
Harbor Large Cap Value Admin
HLQVX20.64-0.02
-0.10%
JPMorgan Large Cap Value I
HGASX28.62-0.18
-0.62%
Hennessy Gas Utility Institutional

BAND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAND has been loosely correlated with APPN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAND jumps, then APPN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAND
1D Price
Change %
BAND100%
-2.42%
APPN - BAND
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
CMRC - BAND
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
PATH - BAND
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
FIVN - BAND
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
RNG - BAND
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
More

BRQSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRQSF and FLYW have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRQSF and FLYW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRQSF
1D Price
Change %
BRQSF100%
-6.13%
FLYW - BRQSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
ZS - BRQSF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
BB - BRQSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
BAND - BRQSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
FTFT - BRQSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+6.78%
More