BAND
Price
$14.99
Change
-$0.15 (-0.99%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
460.53M
One day until earnings call
BRQSF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAND vs BRQSF

Header iconBAND vs BRQSF Comparison
Open Charts BAND vs BRQSFBanner chart's image
Bandwidth
Price$14.99
Change-$0.15 (-0.99%)
Volume$218.11K
Capitalization460.53M
Borqs Technologies
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$25.29K
CapitalizationN/A
BAND vs BRQSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRQSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAND vs. BRQSF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAND is a Hold and BRQSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BAND: $14.99 vs. BRQSF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: BAND and BRQSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAND: 91% vs. BRQSF: 96%
Market capitalization -- BAND: $460.53M vs. BRQSF: $0
BAND [@Packaged Software] is valued at $460.53M. BRQSF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBRQSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BRQSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRQSF is a better buy in the long-term than BAND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAND’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BRQSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BRQSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRQSF is a better buy in the short-term than BAND.

Price Growth

BAND (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.54% price change this week, while BRQSF (@Packaged Software) price change was +6.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAND is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.37% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAND YTD gains are higher at: -11.927 vs. BRQSF (-40.016).
BANDBRQSFBAND / BRQSF
Capitalization461MN/A-
EBITDA23.2MN/A-
Gain YTD-11.927-40.01630%
P/E Ratio357.14N/A-
Revenue601MN/A-
Total Cash153MN/A-
Total Debt645MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAND vs BRQSF: Fundamental Ratings
BAND
BRQSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
90100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8695
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRQSF's Valuation (53) in the Miscellaneous industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAND (87) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that BRQSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAND’s over the last 12 months.

BRQSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as BAND (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that BRQSF’s stock grew similarly to BAND’s over the last 12 months.

BAND's SMR Rating (90) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as BRQSF (100) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that BAND’s stock grew similarly to BRQSF’s over the last 12 months.

BAND's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as BRQSF (63) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that BAND’s stock grew similarly to BRQSF’s over the last 12 months.

BAND's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as BRQSF (95) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that BAND’s stock grew similarly to BRQSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANDBRQSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRQSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TLN346.627.46
+2.20%
Talen Energy Corp
SSD165.662.11
+1.29%
Simpson Manufacturing Co
BCG2.35-0.01
-0.42%
Binah Capital Group
RCEL5.77-0.21
-3.51%
Avita Medical
TELO2.19-0.10
-4.37%
Telomir Pharmaceuticals

BAND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAND has been loosely correlated with APPN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAND jumps, then APPN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAND
1D Price
Change %
BAND100%
-5.78%
APPN - BAND
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
CFLT - BAND
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
BIGC - BAND
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.58%
RNG - BAND
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.34%
ONTF - BAND
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
More

BRQSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRQSF and FLYW have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRQSF and FLYW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRQSF
1D Price
Change %
BRQSF100%
-0.81%
FLYW - BRQSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
ZS - BRQSF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BB - BRQSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAND - BRQSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-5.78%
FTFT - BRQSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.02%
More