BANC
Price
$19.67
Change
-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WDFN
Price
$27.00
Change
+$0.07 (+0.26%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
Capitalization
37.78M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BANC vs WDFN

Header iconBANC vs WDFN Comparison
Open Charts BANC vs WDFNBanner chart's image
Banc of California
Price$19.67
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Volume$699.31K
Capitalization3.06B
Woodlands Financial Services
Price$27.00
Change+$0.07 (+0.26%)
Volume$310
Capitalization37.78M
BANC vs WDFN Comparison Chart in %
BANC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WDFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANC vs. WDFN commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANC is a Buy and WDFN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BANC: $19.67 vs. WDFN: $27.00)
Brand notoriety: BANC and WDFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANC: 28% vs. WDFN: 38%
Market capitalization -- BANC: $3.06B vs. WDFN: $37.78M
BANC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.06B. WDFN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $37.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWDFN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BANC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WDFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BANC and WDFN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDFN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WDFN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WDFN is a better buy in the short-term than BANC.

Price Growth

BANC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.10% price change this week, while WDFN (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BANC($3.06B) has a higher market cap than WDFN($37.8M). BANC has higher P/E ratio than WDFN: BANC (19.10) vs WDFN (8.09). WDFN YTD gains are higher at: 40.436 vs. BANC (29.914). BANC has more cash in the bank: 222M vs. WDFN (10.4M). WDFN has less debt than BANC: WDFN (14M) vs BANC (2.96B). BANC has higher revenues than WDFN: BANC (1.07B) vs WDFN (22.3M).
BANCWDFNBANC / WDFN
Capitalization3.06B37.8M8,090%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.91440.43674%
P/E Ratio19.108.09236%
Revenue1.07B22.3M4,816%
Total Cash222M10.4M2,135%
Total Debt2.96B14M21,114%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANC vs WDFN: Fundamental Ratings
BANC
WDFN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5875
SMR RATING
1..100
1257
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8874
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8533

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WDFN's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANC (72) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WDFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANC’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WDFN (75) in the null industry. This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WDFN (57) in the null industry. This means that BANC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WDFN (46) in the null industry. This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

WDFN's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as BANC (88) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WDFN’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANCWDFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BANC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WDFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAIMX23.830.07
+0.29%
Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value A
FOBAX20.200.05
+0.25%
Tributary Balanced Instl
JACCX35.750.07
+0.20%
Janus Henderson Forty C
OCIEX15.530.03
+0.19%
Optimum International C
QUAYX79.970.09
+0.11%
AB Small Cap Growth Advisor

BANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANC has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANC jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANC
1D Price
Change %
BANC100%
-0.10%
FNB - BANC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
BKU - BANC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
UCB - BANC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
TRMK - BANC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
CADE - BANC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
More

WDFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WDFN and PRMY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WDFN and PRMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDFN
1D Price
Change %
WDFN100%
N/A
PRMY - WDFN
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BANC - WDFN
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
KNFSF - WDFN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DB - WDFN
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
FUSB - WDFN
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
More