BANC
Price
$16.68
Change
+$0.07 (+0.42%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.63B
30 days until earnings call
HFBL
Price
$13.74
Change
+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
42.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BANC vs HFBL

Header iconBANC vs HFBL Comparison
Open Charts BANC vs HFBLBanner chart's image
Banc of California
Price$16.68
Change+$0.07 (+0.42%)
Volume$1.44M
Capitalization2.63B
Home Federal Ban
Price$13.74
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Volume$252
Capitalization42.02M
BANC vs HFBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANC vs. HFBL commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANC is a Buy and HFBL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BANC: $16.68 vs. HFBL: $13.74)
Brand notoriety: BANC and HFBL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANC: 68% vs. HFBL: 10%
Market capitalization -- BANC: $2.63B vs. HFBL: $42.02M
BANC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.63B. HFBL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $42.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHFBL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BANC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HFBL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BANC is a better buy in the long-term than HFBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFBL’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HFBL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HFBL is a better buy in the short-term than BANC.

Price Growth

BANC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.07% price change this week, while HFBL (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BANC($2.63B) has a higher market cap than HFBL($42M). BANC has higher P/E ratio than HFBL: BANC (25.66) vs HFBL (10.90). HFBL YTD gains are higher at: 12.870 vs. BANC (10.166). BANC has more cash in the bank: 222M vs. HFBL (8.24M). HFBL has less debt than BANC: HFBL (4M) vs BANC (2.87B).
BANCHFBLBANC / HFBL
Capitalization2.63B42M6,257%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.16612.87079%
P/E Ratio25.6610.90235%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash222M8.24M2,694%
Total Debt2.87B4M71,650%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANC vs HFBL: Fundamental Ratings
BANC
HFBL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8596
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5971
SMR RATING
1..100
1377
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6544
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
509

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HFBL's Valuation (28) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANC (79) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HFBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANC’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFBL (71) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFBL (77) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BANC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFBL (51) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

HFBL's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BANC (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HFBL’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANCHFBL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLVPX20.110.20
+1.00%
MFS Low Volatility Equity R3
TRQZX103.950.93
+0.90%
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
QUAZX75.880.59
+0.78%
AB Small Cap Growth Z
CAXIX19.940.14
+0.71%
Catalyst/MAP Global Equity I
MAEGX15.410.07
+0.46%
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Instl

BANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANC has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANC jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANC
1D Price
Change %
BANC100%
+0.42%
FNB - BANC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
TRMK - BANC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
UCB - BANC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
COLB - BANC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
BKU - BANC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
More

HFBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HFBL and KEY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFBL and KEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFBL
1D Price
Change %
HFBL100%
+0.15%
KEY - HFBL
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
WSFS - HFBL
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
BANC - HFBL
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
RF - HFBL
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
TFC - HFBL
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More