It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BANC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFIBK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BANC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIBK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BANC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.26% price change this week, while FIBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.02%.
BANC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
FIBK is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
BANC | FIBK | BANC / FIBK | |
Capitalization | 2.29B | 2.83B | 81% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 24.761 | 16.557 | 150% |
P/E Ratio | 6.84 | 10.60 | 65% |
Revenue | 278M | 1.03B | 27% |
Total Cash | 45.9M | 372M | 12% |
Total Debt | 3.85B | 2.89B | 133% |
BANC | FIBK | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FIBK's Valuation (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANC (65). This means that FIBK’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.
BANC's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FIBK (91). This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to FIBK’s over the last 12 months.
FIBK's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANC (19). This means that FIBK’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.
BANC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FIBK (41). This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to FIBK’s over the last 12 months.
FIBK's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BANC (91). This means that FIBK’s stock grew significantly faster than BANC’s over the last 12 months.
BANC | FIBK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago72% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago51% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANC has been closely correlated with SSB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANC jumps, then SSB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BANC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BANC | 100% | -1.32% | ||
SSB - BANC | 77% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
UBSI - BANC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
PPBI - BANC | 76% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
ONB - BANC | 76% Closely correlated | -0.85% | ||
FIBK - BANC | 76% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIBK has been closely correlated with SBCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FIBK jumps, then SBCF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FIBK | 100% | -0.68% | ||
SBCF - FIBK | 90% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
ONB - FIBK | 90% Closely correlated | -0.85% | ||
TCBK - FIBK | 89% Closely correlated | -1.12% | ||
ASB - FIBK | 89% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
HWC - FIBK | 89% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
More |