Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMO vs GDMA
BAMO vs GDMA Comparison
Open Charts BAMO vs GDMA
Brookstone Opportunities ETF
Price$32.64
Change+$0.14 (+0.43%)
Volume$4.12K
Net Assets43.06M
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
Price$38.69
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
Volume$216
Net Assets157.95M
BAMO vs GDMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMO vs. GDMA commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMO is a Buy and GDMA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDMA has more net assets: 158M vs. BAMO (43.1M). GDMA has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMO: GDMA (22.108) vs BAMO (8.056). BAMO was incepted earlier than GDMA: BAMO (2 years) vs GDMA (7 years). GDMA (0.78) has a lower expense ratio than BAMO (1.06). GDMA has a higher turnover BAMO (0.00) vs BAMO (0.00).
| BAMO | GDMA | BAMO / GDMA | |
| Gain YTD | 8.056 | 22.108 | 36% |
| Net Assets | 43.1M | 158M | 27% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.78 | 136% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 674.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.52 | 1.90 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMO | GDMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 44% | 7 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 33% | 7 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 55% | 7 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 44% | 15 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HWSIX | 76.72 | 1.32 | +1.75% |
| Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value I | |||
| RYBAX | 81.33 | 0.67 | +0.83% |
| Rydex Basic Materials H | |||
| FTUCX | 58.72 | 0.40 | +0.69% |
| Fidelity Advisor Telecommunications C | |||
| VVIIX | 13.69 | 0.07 | +0.51% |
| VOYA VACS Index Series I Portfolio | |||
| ILGRX | 40.98 | -0.09 | -0.22% |
| Nomura Large Cap Growth R6 | |||
GDMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GDMA and NEM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDMA and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDMA | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| NEM - GDMA | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
| LMT - GDMA | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
| AEE - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| NOC - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.16% | ||
| DLTR - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +3.61% | ||
More | ||||