Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMO vs GDMA
BAMO vs GDMA Comparison
Open Charts BAMO vs GDMA
Brookstone Opportunities ETF
Price$32.85
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
Volume$163
Net Assets43.93M
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
Price$41.28
Change+$0.50 (+1.23%)
Volume$200
Net Assets173.93M
BAMO vs GDMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMO vs. GDMA commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMO is a Hold and GDMA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDMA has more net assets: 174M vs. BAMO (43.9M). GDMA has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMO: GDMA (5.785) vs BAMO (1.100). BAMO was incepted earlier than GDMA: BAMO (2 years) vs GDMA (7 years). GDMA (0.78) has a lower expense ratio than BAMO (1.06). GDMA has a higher turnover BAMO (0.00) vs BAMO (0.00).
| BAMO | GDMA | BAMO / GDMA | |
| Gain YTD | 1.100 | 5.785 | 19% |
| Net Assets | 43.9M | 174M | 25% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.78 | 136% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 674.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.54 | 2.79 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMO | GDMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 13 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 13 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 44% | 15 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GDMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GDMA and NEM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDMA and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDMA | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| NEM - GDMA | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.48% | ||
| GOLD - GDMA | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.69% | ||
| LMT - GDMA | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
| AEE - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
| NOC - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
More | ||||