Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMO vs CLSM
BAMO vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts BAMO vs CLSM
Brookstone Opportunities ETF
Price$32.64
Change+$0.14 (+0.43%)
Volume$4.12K
Net Assets43.06M
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$23.49
Change+$0.06 (+0.26%)
Volume$200
Net Assets109.76M
BAMO vs CLSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMO vs. CLSM commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMO is a Hold and CLSM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSM has more net assets: 110M vs. BAMO (43.1M). CLSM has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMO: CLSM (15.299) vs BAMO (8.056). BAMO was incepted earlier than CLSM: BAMO (2 years) vs CLSM (4 years). CLSM (0.82) has a lower expense ratio than BAMO (1.06). CLSM has a higher turnover BAMO (0.00) vs BAMO (0.00).
| BAMO | CLSM | BAMO / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | 8.056 | 15.299 | 53% |
| Net Assets | 43.1M | 110M | 39% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.82 | 129% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 401.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.52 | 1.84 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMO | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 44% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 33% | 6 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 55% | 6 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 44% | 16 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSM and FIG have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSM and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSM | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| FIG - CLSM | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.51% |