Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMO vs CGBL
BAMO vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts BAMO vs CGBL
Brookstone Opportunities ETF
Price$31.44
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
Volume$2.28K
Net Assets41.22M
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$33.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.27%)
Volume$606.81K
Net Assets2.75B
BAMO vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMO vs. CGBL commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMO is a Buy and CGBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 2.75B vs. BAMO (41.2M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMO: CGBL (9.285) vs BAMO (4.023). BAMO was incepted earlier than CGBL: BAMO (2 years) vs CGBL (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than BAMO (1.06). CGBL has a higher turnover BAMO (0.00) vs BAMO (0.00).
| BAMO | CGBL | BAMO / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 4.023 | 9.285 | 43% |
| Net Assets | 41.2M | 2.75B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.33 | 321% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.39 | 1.93 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMO | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 52% | 21 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AVIE | 61.03 | 0.10 | +0.17% |
| Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF | |||
| NMS | 11.18 | N/A | +0.03% |
| Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
| NBCR | 29.63 | N/A | N/A |
| Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF | |||
| VTWG | 214.54 | -0.22 | -0.10% |
| Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | |||
| QID | 24.20 | -0.08 | -0.33% |
| ProShares UltraShort QQQ | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
More | ||||