Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMO vs CGBL
BAMO vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts BAMO vs CGBL
Brookstone Opportunities ETF
Price$32.10
Change+$0.05 (+0.16%)
Volume$15K
Net Assets42.95M
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$1.08M
Net Assets3.65B
BAMO vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMO vs. CGBL commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMO is a Hold and CGBL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.65B vs. BAMO (42.9M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMO: CGBL (12.724) vs BAMO (6.660). BAMO was incepted earlier than CGBL: BAMO (2 years) vs CGBL (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than BAMO (1.06). CGBL has a higher turnover BAMO (0.00) vs BAMO (0.00).
| BAMO | CGBL | BAMO / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 6.660 | 12.724 | 52% |
| Net Assets | 42.9M | 3.65B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.33 | 321% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.42 | 1.96 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMO | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
More | ||||