Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMG vs SCHG
BAMG vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts BAMG vs SCHG
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF
Price$38.34
Change-$0.50 (-1.29%)
Volume$899
Net Assets127.06M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$30.54
Change-$0.54 (-1.74%)
Volume$10.99K
Net Assets51.5B
BAMG vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMG vs. SCHG commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMG is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 51.5B vs. BAMG (127M). BAMG has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: BAMG (-3.215) vs SCHG (-4.721). BAMG was incepted earlier than SCHG: BAMG (2 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than BAMG (0.89). BAMG has a higher turnover SCHG (27.00) vs SCHG (27.00).
| BAMG | SCHG | BAMG / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | -3.215 | -4.721 | 68% |
| Net Assets | 127M | 51.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.04 | 2,225% |
| Turnover | 63.00 | 27.00 | 233% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.37 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BAMG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAMG has been closely correlated with TRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAMG jumps, then TRU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BAMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAMG | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| TRU - BAMG | 74% Closely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| AMZN - BAMG | 74% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| FTV - BAMG | 74% Closely correlated | +10.63% | ||
| NOW - BAMG | 73% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| AAPL - BAMG | 70% Closely correlated | +2.60% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -1.15% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | -3.41% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| APO - SCHG | 74% Closely correlated | +4.69% | ||
More | ||||