Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMG vs IWF
BAMG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts BAMG vs IWF
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF
Price$37.55
Change+$0.16 (+0.43%)
Volume$8.5K
Net Assets122.38M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$439.88
Change+$2.03 (+0.46%)
Volume$1.04M
Net Assets114.89B
BAMG vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMG vs. IWF commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMG is a Buy and IWF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 115B vs. BAMG (122M). IWF (9.761) and BAMG (9.496) have matching annual dividend yield . BAMG was incepted earlier than IWF: BAMG (2 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than BAMG (0.95). BAMG has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| BAMG | IWF | BAMG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 9.496 | 9.761 | 97% |
| Net Assets | 122M | 115B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.19 | 500% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 12.00 | 217% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 0.42 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 63% | 17 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BAMG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAMG has been closely correlated with TRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAMG jumps, then TRU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BAMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAMG | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| TRU - BAMG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| AXP - BAMG | 77% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| AMZN - BAMG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| META - BAMG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| FTV - BAMG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
More | ||||