| BAMG | IWF | BAMG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 14.450 | 17.366 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 137M | 123B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.18 | 494% |
| Turnover | 63.00 | 13.00 | 485% |
| Yield | 0.18 | 0.34 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 26 years | - |
| BAMG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 18 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSEE | 57.08 | -0.69 | -1.19% |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emer Mkt Eq ETF | |||
| PJFV | 81.16 | -1.29 | -1.56% |
| PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF | |||
| XMHQ | 101.06 | -2.13 | -2.06% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | |||
| FNGS | 70.39 | -1.61 | -2.24% |
| MicroSectors™ FANG+™ ETN | |||
| SMCY | 10.07 | -0.93 | -8.45% |
| YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAMG has been closely correlated with AXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAMG jumps, then AXP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BAMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAMG | 100% | -1.99% | ||
| AXP - BAMG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.16% | ||
| AMZN - BAMG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| TRU - BAMG | 74% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| FTV - BAMG | 74% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| NOW - BAMG | 73% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -2.12% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
More | ||||