Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMG vs IWF
BAMG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts BAMG vs IWF
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF
Price$36.21
Change-$0.10 (-0.28%)
Volume$23.19K
Net Assets110.04M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$442.93
Change-$6.23 (-1.39%)
Volume$741.15K
Net Assets115.54B
BAMG vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMG vs. IWF commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMG is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 116B vs. BAMG (110M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMG: IWF (10.522) vs BAMG (5.599). BAMG was incepted earlier than IWF: BAMG (2 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than BAMG (0.95). BAMG has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| BAMG | IWF | BAMG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 5.599 | 10.522 | 53% |
| Net Assets | 110M | 116B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.19 | 500% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 12.00 | 217% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 0.40 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 21 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 62% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BAMG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAMG has been closely correlated with TRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAMG jumps, then TRU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BAMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAMG | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| TRU - BAMG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| AMZN - BAMG | 75% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| FTV - BAMG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| NOW - BAMG | 74% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| META - BAMG | 73% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.63% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
More | ||||