Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMG vs IWF
BAMG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts BAMG vs IWF
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF
Price$35.48
Change+$0.50 (+1.43%)
Volume$535
Net Assets108.5M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$410.64
Change+$5.07 (+1.25%)
Volume$1.58K
Net Assets106.55B
BAMG vs IWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMG vs. IWF commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMG is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 107B vs. BAMG (109M). BAMG has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: BAMG (2.012) vs IWF (1.102). BAMG was incepted earlier than IWF: BAMG (2 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than BAMG (0.95). BAMG has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| BAMG | IWF | BAMG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 2.012 | 1.102 | 183% |
| Net Assets | 109M | 107B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.19 | 500% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 12.00 | 217% |
| Yield | 0.22 | 0.45 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 66% | 27 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BAMG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAMG has been closely correlated with AXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAMG jumps, then AXP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BAMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAMG | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| AXP - BAMG | 77% Closely correlated | -3.42% | ||
| AMZN - BAMG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| FTV - BAMG | 77% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| QCOM - BAMG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.51% | ||
| TRU - BAMG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -3.26% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
More | ||||