Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CLSM
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CLSM
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$34.30
Change-$0.09 (-0.26%)
Volume$1.7K
Net Assets46.77M
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$23.85
Change+$0.15 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.12M
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CLSM commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a Hold and CLSM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSM has more net assets: 105M vs. BAMA (46.8M). CLSM has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CLSM (2.001) vs BAMA (1.147). BAMA was incepted earlier than CLSM: BAMA (2 years) vs CLSM (5 years). CLSM (0.82) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CLSM has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CLSM | BAMA / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | 1.147 | 2.001 | 57% |
| Net Assets | 46.8M | 105M | 45% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.82 | 121% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 401.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.54 | 0.90 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IJMAX | 14.02 | 0.10 | +0.72% |
| VY® JPMorgan Mid Cap Value A | |||
| BRZAX | 12.96 | 0.05 | +0.39% |
| BlackRock Sust Aware Adg Intl Eq Inv A | |||
| TRZKX | 78.12 | 0.24 | +0.31% |
| T. Rowe Price International Discovery Z | |||
| AMOMX | 20.34 | -0.18 | -0.88% |
| AQR Large Cap Momentum Style I | |||
| SPFZX | 33.42 | -0.53 | -1.56% |
| PGIM Jennison Focused Growth Z | |||
CLSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSM and FIG have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSM and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSM | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| FIG - CLSM | 2% Poorly correlated | -3.58% |