Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CLSM
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CLSM
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$34.25
Change-$0.14 (-0.41%)
Volume$677
Net Assets46.44M
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$23.67
Change-$0.22 (-0.92%)
Volume$500
Net Assets104.16M
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CLSM commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a Buy and CLSM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSM has more net assets: 104M vs. BAMA (46.4M). CLSM has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CLSM (2.821) vs BAMA (1.420). BAMA was incepted earlier than CLSM: BAMA (2 years) vs CLSM (5 years). CLSM (0.82) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CLSM has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CLSM | BAMA / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | 1.420 | 2.821 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 46.4M | 104M | 45% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.82 | 121% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 401.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.52 | 0.87 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | 8 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 52% | 6 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSM and FIG have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSM and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSM | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| FIG - CLSM | 2% Poorly correlated | -10.88% |