Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CLSM
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CLSM
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$33.61
Change+$0.07 (+0.21%)
Volume$16.27K
Net Assets46.63M
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$23.34
Change+$0.11 (+0.47%)
Volume$5.74K
Net Assets113.37M
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CLSM commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a Hold and CLSM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSM has more net assets: 113M vs. BAMA (46.6M). CLSM has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CLSM (14.792) vs BAMA (10.607). BAMA was incepted earlier than CLSM: BAMA (2 years) vs CLSM (4 years). CLSM (0.82) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CLSM has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CLSM | BAMA / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | 10.607 | 14.792 | 72% |
| Net Assets | 46.6M | 113M | 41% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.82 | 121% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 401.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.33 | 1.88 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 54% | 9 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSM and FIG have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSM and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSM | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| FIG - CLSM | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.64% |