Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CGBL
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CGBL
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$34.29
Change-$0.10 (-0.29%)
Volume$320
Net Assets46.87M
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$36.12
Change-$0.11 (-0.30%)
Volume$3.34K
Net Assets4.65B
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CGBL commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a Hold and CGBL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 4.66B vs. BAMA (46.9M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CGBL (2.547) vs BAMA (1.407). BAMA was incepted earlier than CGBL: BAMA (2 years) vs CGBL (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CGBL has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CGBL | BAMA / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 1.407 | 2.547 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 46.9M | 4.66B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.33 | 300% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.54 | 1.98 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 54% | 15 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RITPF | 30.00 | N/A | N/A |
| RIT Capital Partners Plc. | |||
| MAYP | 31.06 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - May | |||
| BSMR | 23.74 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2027 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| CGIE | 36.29 | -0.23 | -0.63% |
| Capital Group International Equity ETF | |||
| ENZL | 45.52 | -0.58 | -1.26% |
| iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -2.91% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | -3.04% | ||
More | ||||