Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CGBL
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CGBL
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$32.77
Change-$0.04 (-0.12%)
Volume$1.27K
Net Assets44.57M
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$33.91
Change-$0.12 (-0.35%)
Volume$629.08K
Net Assets3.08B
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CGBL commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a Hold and CGBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.08B vs. BAMA (44.6M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CGBL (9.414) vs BAMA (7.417). BAMA was incepted earlier than CGBL: BAMA (2 years) vs CGBL (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CGBL has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CGBL | BAMA / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 7.417 | 9.414 | 79% |
| Net Assets | 44.6M | 3.08B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.33 | 300% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.36 | 1.91 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -3.15% | ||
More | ||||