Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CGBL
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CGBL
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$32.07
Change+$0.11 (+0.34%)
Volume$2.5K
Net Assets43.31M
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$33.70
Change+$0.15 (+0.45%)
Volume$372.14K
Net Assets2.59B
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CGBL commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a StrongBuy and CGBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 2.59B vs. BAMA (43.3M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CGBL (8.736) vs BAMA (5.121). BAMA was incepted earlier than CGBL: BAMA (2 years) vs CGBL (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CGBL has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CGBL | BAMA / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 5.121 | 8.736 | 59% |
| Net Assets | 43.3M | 2.59B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.33 | 300% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.37 | 1.93 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 59% | 17 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UFEB | 34.47 | 0.11 | +0.32% |
| Innovator US Equity Ultra Bffr ETF™ Feb | |||
| CXH | 7.62 | 0.01 | +0.13% |
| MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust | |||
| FLBL | 24.16 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| Franklin Senior Loan ETF | |||
| MYCM | 24.63 | N/A | N/A |
| SPDR SSGA My2033 Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| EWV | 32.51 | -0.29 | -0.90% |
| ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.45% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +3.03% | ||
| IR - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||