Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CGBL
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CGBL
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$31.05
Change-$0.26 (-0.83%)
Volume$2.12K
Net Assets42.27M
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$32.63
Change-$0.35 (-1.06%)
Volume$538.09K
Net Assets2.37B
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CGBL commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a Buy and CGBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 2.37B vs. BAMA (42.3M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CGBL (4.766) vs BAMA (1.781). BAMA was incepted earlier than CGBL: BAMA (2 years) vs CGBL (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CGBL has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CGBL | BAMA / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 1.781 | 4.766 | 37% |
| Net Assets | 42.3M | 2.37B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.33 | 300% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.42 | 1.92 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 60% | 25 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -4.34% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 74% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
More | ||||