Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CGBL
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CGBL
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$32.47
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Volume$3.44K
Net Assets43.82M
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$33.96
Change+$0.07 (+0.21%)
Volume$523.27K
Net Assets2.75B
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CGBL commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a StrongBuy and CGBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 2.75B vs. BAMA (43.8M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CGBL (9.575) vs BAMA (6.422). BAMA was incepted earlier than CGBL: BAMA (2 years) vs CGBL (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CGBL has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CGBL | BAMA / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 6.422 | 9.575 | 67% |
| Net Assets | 43.8M | 2.75B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.33 | 300% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.37 | 1.93 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 45% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
More | ||||