Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CGBL
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CGBL
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$33.61
Change+$0.07 (+0.21%)
Volume$16.27K
Net Assets46.63M
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$1.08M
Net Assets3.65B
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CGBL commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a Hold and CGBL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.65B vs. BAMA (46.6M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CGBL (12.724) vs BAMA (10.607). BAMA was incepted earlier than CGBL: BAMA (2 years) vs CGBL (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CGBL has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CGBL | BAMA / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 10.607 | 12.724 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 46.6M | 3.65B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.33 | 300% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.33 | 1.96 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PBP | 22.47 | 0.19 | +0.85% |
| Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | |||
| SCHY | 28.35 | 0.13 | +0.46% |
| Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | |||
| OCTD | 23.89 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - October | |||
| PLTW | 45.10 | -0.05 | -0.11% |
| Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF | |||
| ENZL | 45.17 | -0.24 | -0.54% |
| iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
More | ||||