BAM
Price
$61.41
Change
-$0.70 (-1.13%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
99.52B
VINP
Price
$10.16
Change
-$0.17 (-1.65%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
642.57M
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs VINP

Header iconBAM vs VINP Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs VINPBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$61.41
Change-$0.70 (-1.13%)
Volume$920.37K
Capitalization99.52B
Vinci Compass Investments
Price$10.16
Change-$0.17 (-1.65%)
Volume$28.6K
Capitalization642.57M
BAM vs VINP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. VINP commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and VINP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $61.41 vs. VINP: $10.16)
Brand notoriety: BAM and VINP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 41% vs. VINP: 56%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $99.52B vs. VINP: $642.57M
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $99.52B. VINP’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $642.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVINP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VINP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than VINP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VINP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VINP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VINP is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.24% price change this week, while VINP (@Investment Managers) price change was +6.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

VINP is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.77% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($99.5B) has a higher market cap than VINP($643M). BAM has higher P/E ratio than VINP: BAM (42.94) vs VINP (20.60). BAM YTD gains are higher at: 15.116 vs. VINP (4.093). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 886M vs. VINP (244M). VINP has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. BAM (332M). BAM has less debt than VINP: BAM (639M) vs VINP (942M). VINP has higher revenues than BAM: VINP (791M) vs BAM (543M).
BAMVINPBAM / VINP
Capitalization99.5B643M15,474%
EBITDA886M244M363%
Gain YTD15.1164.093369%
P/E Ratio42.9420.60208%
Revenue543M791M69%
Total Cash332M1.65B20%
Total Debt639M942M68%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
66
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMVINP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRGOX26.450.43
+1.65%
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals C
FAPLX13.210.05
+0.38%
Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future M
FZAJX22.85N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Z
PRNIX29.39-0.10
-0.34%
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Inst
SJCAX32.15-0.15
-0.46%
Steward Large Cap Core A

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-1.13%
BN - BAM
85%
Closely correlated
N/A
BX - BAM
78%
Closely correlated
N/A
KKR - BAM
77%
Closely correlated
-2.59%
CG - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
STEP - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
More

VINP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VINP has been loosely correlated with PAX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VINP jumps, then PAX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VINP
1D Price
Change %
VINP100%
-1.65%
PAX - VINP
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
BN - VINP
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SEIC - VINP
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
BAM - VINP
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
TROW - VINP
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
More