BAM
Price
$57.14
Change
+$0.29 (+0.51%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.34B
HPH
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.05 (-18.52%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
2.28B
Ad is loading...

BAM vs HPH

Header iconBAM vs HPH Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs HPHBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$57.14
Change+$0.29 (+0.51%)
Volume$6.13K
Capitalization16.34B
Highest Performances Holdings
Price$0.22
Change-$0.05 (-18.52%)
Volume$456.25K
Capitalization2.28B
BAM vs HPH Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. HPH commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and HPH is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $56.85 vs. HPH: $0.27)
Brand notoriety: BAM and HPH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 61% vs. HPH: 165%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. HPH: $2.28B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. HPH’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHPH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HPH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than HPH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HPH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HPH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than HPH.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +7.26% price change this week, while HPH (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.03% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($16.3B) has a higher market cap than HPH($2.28B). BAM YTD gains are higher at: 4.909 vs. HPH (-20.179).
BAMHPHBAM / HPH
Capitalization16.3B2.28B715%
EBITDA522MN/A-
Gain YTD4.909-20.179-24%
P/E Ratio37.12N/A-
Revenue383MN/A-
Total Cash9MN/A-
Total Debt256MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs HPH: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
HPH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
127
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46100
SMR RATING
1..100
52100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4166
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as HPH (48). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to HPH’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HPH (100). This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HPH’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HPH (100). This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HPH’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as HPH (66). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to HPH’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HPH (100). This means that BAM’s stock grew significantly faster than HPH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMHPH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
54%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
+2.30%
BN - BAM
81%
Closely correlated
+2.85%
BX - BAM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
APAM - BAM
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.40%
CG - BAM
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
SEIC - BAM
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
More

HPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HPH and CRBG have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HPH and CRBG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HPH
1D Price
Change %
HPH100%
+0.30%
CRBG - HPH
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
PWM - HPH
10%
Poorly correlated
-8.09%
CWD - HPH
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
BAM - HPH
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
CIXXF - HPH
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More