BAM
Price
$53.48
Change
+$0.35 (+0.66%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
86.06B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GCMG
Price
$11.53
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
722.43M
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs GCMG

Header iconBAM vs GCMG Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs GCMGBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$53.48
Change+$0.35 (+0.66%)
Volume$820.63K
Capitalization86.06B
GCM Grosvenor
Price$11.53
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$295.58K
Capitalization722.43M
BAM vs GCMG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. GCMG commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a StrongBuy and GCMG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $53.48 vs. GCMG: $11.53)
Brand notoriety: BAM and GCMG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 33% vs. GCMG: 34%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $86.06B vs. GCMG: $722.43M
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $86.06B. GCMG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $722.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $168.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGCMG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GCMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAM and GCMG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCMG’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GCMG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCMG is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.44% price change this week, while GCMG (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

GCMG is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.89% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($86.1B) has a higher market cap than GCMG($722M). GCMG (36.03) and BAM (34.50) have similar P/E ratio . BAM YTD gains are higher at: 0.978 vs. GCMG (-3.637). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.07B vs. GCMG (155M). BAM has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. GCMG (183M). GCMG has less debt than BAM: GCMG (482M) vs BAM (2.8B). BAM has higher revenues than GCMG: BAM (913M) vs GCMG (558M).
BAMGCMGBAM / GCMG
Capitalization86.1B722M11,925%
EBITDA1.07B155M690%
Gain YTD0.978-3.637-27%
P/E Ratio34.5036.0396%
Revenue913M558M164%
Total Cash1.06B183M580%
Total Debt2.8B482M582%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs GCMG: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
GCMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7941
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6859
SMR RATING
1..100
516
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCMG (72). This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCMG’s over the last 12 months.

GCMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (68). This means that GCMG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

GCMG's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (51). This means that GCMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

GCMG's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (58). This means that GCMG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as GCMG (100). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to GCMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMGCMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GCMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRERX48.640.14
+0.29%
MFS Core Equity R2
FSYNX11.660.03
+0.26%
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable EM Eq M
TEGYX41.280.10
+0.24%
Touchstone Mid Cap Growth Y
APDQX14.870.03
+0.20%
Artisan Mid Cap Value Advisor
NWHOX27.620.05
+0.18%
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci A

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
+0.66%
BN - BAM
86%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
KKR - BAM
76%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
CG - BAM
76%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
BX - BAM
76%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
APO - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
More

GCMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCMG has been loosely correlated with STEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GCMG jumps, then STEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCMG
1D Price
Change %
GCMG100%
+0.09%
STEP - GCMG
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
BX - GCMG
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
BAM - GCMG
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
KKR - GCMG
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
PX - GCMG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
More