BAM
Price
$51.92
Change
-$0.58 (-1.10%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
84.65B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EWC
Price
$55.15
Change
+$0.03 (+0.05%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.95B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs EWC

Header iconBAM vs EWC Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs EWCBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$51.92
Change-$0.58 (-1.10%)
Volume$58.5K
Capitalization84.65B
iShares MSCI Canada ETF
Price$55.15
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
Volume$17.3K
Net Assets3.95B
BAM vs EWC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. EWC commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and EWC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (BAM: $52.50)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.79% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.47% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMEWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OBIL50.240.01
+0.02%
F/m US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF
VIOV103.06-0.26
-0.25%
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
TSMX58.10-0.37
-0.63%
Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares
AMZZ34.53-1.14
-3.20%
GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF
PDDL27.44-3.27
-10.66%
GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-3.55%
BN - BAM
86%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
KKR - BAM
77%
Closely correlated
-2.90%
BX - BAM
77%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
CG - BAM
76%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
APO - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
More

EWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EWC
1D Price
Change %
EWC100%
+0.05%
BN - EWC
79%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
MFC - EWC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
RY - EWC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
BAM - EWC
71%
Closely correlated
-3.55%
CM - EWC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
More