BAM
Price
$54.20
Change
+$0.04 (+0.07%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
87.18B
CG
Price
$57.14
Change
+$0.15 (+0.26%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
20.67B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs CG

Header iconBAM vs CG Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs CGBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$54.20
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
Volume$2.31M
Capitalization87.18B
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$57.14
Change+$0.15 (+0.26%)
Volume$1.65M
Capitalization20.67B
BAM vs CG Comparison Chart in %
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. CG commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and CG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $54.16 vs. CG: $56.99)
Brand notoriety: BAM and CG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 122% vs. CG: 71%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $87.18B vs. CG: $20.67B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $87.18B. CG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $20.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $180.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the long-term than BAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -7.84% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.47% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($87.2B) has a higher market cap than CG($20.7B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than CG: BAM (37.90) vs CG (16.71). CG YTD gains are higher at: 15.417 vs. BAM (2.337). BAM has less debt than CG: BAM (1.25B) vs CG (10.7B). CG has higher revenues than BAM: CG (3.71B) vs BAM (835M).
BAMCGBAM / CG
Capitalization87.2B20.7B421%
EBITDA970MN/A-
Gain YTD2.33715.41715%
P/E Ratio37.9016.71227%
Revenue835M3.71B23%
Total Cash480MN/A-
Total Debt1.25B10.7B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs CG: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
CG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1254
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5538
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7194
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (25) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (55) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (100) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (100) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (94) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYHG64.730.52
+0.80%
ProShares High Yield—Interest Rate Hdgd
IUS55.090.36
+0.66%
Invesco RAFI™ Strategic US ETF
LFAO173.63N/A
N/A
LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF
SCHE33.52-0.08
-0.24%
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF™
SAA24.98-0.06
-0.24%
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
+0.07%
BN - BAM
85%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
BX - BAM
77%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
KKR - BAM
77%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
CG - BAM
76%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
APO - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
More

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
+0.26%
KKR - CG
89%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
TPG - CG
87%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
ARES - CG
85%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
BX - CG
85%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
OWL - CG
84%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
More