BAM
Price
$53.48
Change
+$0.35 (+0.66%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
86.06B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CG
Price
$60.99
Change
+$0.07 (+0.11%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
21.98B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs CG

Header iconBAM vs CG Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs CGBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$53.48
Change+$0.35 (+0.66%)
Volume$820.63K
Capitalization86.06B
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$60.99
Change+$0.07 (+0.11%)
Volume$1.21M
Capitalization21.98B
BAM vs CG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. CG commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and CG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $53.48 vs. CG: $60.99)
Brand notoriety: BAM and CG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 33% vs. CG: 41%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $86.06B vs. CG: $21.98B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $86.06B. CG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $21.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $168.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the long-term than BAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.44% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.89% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($86.1B) has a higher market cap than CG($22B). BAM (34.50) and CG (34.26) have similar P/E ratio . CG YTD gains are higher at: 23.194 vs. BAM (0.978). BAM has less debt than CG: BAM (2.8B) vs CG (12.7B). CG has higher revenues than BAM: CG (2.99B) vs BAM (913M).
BAMCGBAM / CG
Capitalization86.1B22B391%
EBITDA1.07BN/A-
Gain YTD0.97823.1944%
P/E Ratio34.5034.26101%
Revenue913M2.99B31%
Total Cash1.06BN/A-
Total Debt2.8B12.7B22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs CG: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
CG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7225
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6839
SMR RATING
1..100
5150
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8699
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (28) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (68) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (50) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (51) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (58) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (99) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEQI45.530.15
+0.33%
T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF
ARVR49.060.16
+0.32%
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF
PFFD19.100.03
+0.16%
Global X US Preferred ETF
EZPZ22.65-0.18
-0.77%
Franklin Crypto Index ETF
EEA10.93-0.09
-0.82%
European Equity Fund (The)

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
+0.66%
BN - BAM
86%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
KKR - BAM
76%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
CG - BAM
76%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
BX - BAM
76%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
APO - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
More

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
+0.11%
KKR - CG
88%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
TPG - CG
87%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
BX - CG
84%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
ARES - CG
82%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
STEP - CG
82%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
More