BAM
Price
$51.87
Change
-$2.81 (-5.14%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
88.03B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BN
Price
$43.79
Change
-$3.10 (-6.61%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
105.14B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs BN

Header iconBAM vs BN Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs BNBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$51.87
Change-$2.81 (-5.14%)
Volume$23.28K
Capitalization88.03B
Brookfield
Price$43.79
Change-$3.10 (-6.61%)
Volume$147.25K
Capitalization105.14B
BAM vs BN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. BN commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and BN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $54.68 vs. BN: $46.89)
Brand notoriety: BAM and BN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 176% vs. BN: 92%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $88.03B vs. BN: $105.14B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $88.03B. BN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $105.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $169.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than BAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • BN’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.30% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.56% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($105B) has a higher market cap than BAM($88B). BN has higher P/E ratio than BAM: BN (159.85) vs BAM (35.28). BN YTD gains are higher at: 23.453 vs. BAM (3.243). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.3B vs. BAM (970M). BAM has less debt than BN: BAM (1.25B) vs BN (251B). BN has higher revenues than BAM: BN (76.1B) vs BAM (835M).
BAMBNBAM / BN
Capitalization88B105B84%
EBITDA970M30.3B3%
Gain YTD3.24323.45314%
P/E Ratio35.28159.8522%
Revenue835M76.1B1%
Total Cash480MN/A-
Total Debt1.25B251B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs BN: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
BN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
819
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5718
SMR RATING
1..100
5789
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8312
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (34) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (57) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (89) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (74) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BAM (83) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDVD21.570.09
+0.42%
FT Vest SMID Ris Div Ach Trg IncETF
SPTL27.170.05
+0.18%
State Street SPDR Portfolio L/T Trs ETF
OCIO37.770.06
+0.15%
ClearShares OCIO ETF
AZTD27.87N/A
N/A
Aztlan Global Stock Sel Dm SMID ETF
EAI21.43-0.08
-0.37%
Entergy Arkansas LLC

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
+1.11%
BN - BAM
85%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
KKR - BAM
77%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
BX - BAM
76%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
CG - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
ARES - BAM
74%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
More

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+1.58%
BAM - BN
85%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
KKR - BN
82%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
BX - BN
80%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
SEIC - BN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
APO - BN
78%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
More