Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALPX vs HHCZX
BALPX vs HHCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALPX vs. HHCZX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALPX is a Buy and HHCZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALPX has more cash in the bank: 4.87B vs. HHCZX (88.3M). BALPX pays higher dividends than HHCZX: BALPX (4.08) vs HHCZX (0.53). BALPX was incepted earlier than HHCZX: BALPX (18 years) vs HHCZX (17 years). HHCZX (3.07) is less costly to investors than BALPX (1.60). HHCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. BALPX (81.00). BALPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHCZX: BALPX (1000) vs HHCZX (2500). HHCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.82 vs. BALPX (6.27). BALPX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. HHCZX (7.19).
| BALPX | HHCZX | BALPX / HHCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.38 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 3.07 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.431 | 4.933 | 130% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.87B | 88.3M | 5,519% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.08 | 0.53 | 766% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.27 | 6.82 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.52 | 19.27 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.00 | 7.19 | 209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.42 | 8.89 | 230% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers