Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALFX vs WEBCX
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts BALFX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced F1
Price$38.37
Change-$0.56 (-1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$9.70
Change-$1.05 (-9.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.06M
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALFX vs. WEBCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALFX is a Hold and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALFX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. WEBCX (32.1M). BALFX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: BALFX (1.86) vs WEBCX (1.32). BALFX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: BALFX (25 years) vs WEBCX (33 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than BALFX (0.61). WEBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. BALFX (44.00). BALFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: BALFX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). BALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. WEBCX (-5.65). BALFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.49 vs. WEBCX (-10.71).
| BALFX | WEBCX | BALFX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.457 | 1.998 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270B | 32.1M | 841,121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.32 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.33 | -5.65 | -200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.69 | 3.51 | 1,047% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.49 | -10.71 | -331% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.98 | -3.33 | -2,644% |