Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALFX vs WEBCX
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts BALFX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced F1
Price$39.03
Change-$0.49 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.71
Change-$0.10 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.6M
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALFX vs. WEBCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALFX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. WEBCX (33.6M). BALFX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: BALFX (1.70) vs WEBCX (1.17). BALFX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: BALFX (25 years) vs WEBCX (33 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than BALFX (0.61). BALFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). BALFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: BALFX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). BALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.72 vs. WEBCX (-1.54). BALFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.44 vs. WEBCX (-1.08).
| BALFX | WEBCX | BALFX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.780 | 7.949 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 269B | 33.6M | 800,595% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.17 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.72 | -1.54 | -568% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.49 | 10.91 | 389% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.44 | -1.08 | -3,662% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.97 | -2.85 | -2,595% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement