Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALFX vs WEBCX
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts BALFX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced F1
Price$38.97
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.51M
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALFX vs. WEBCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALFX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. WEBCX (33.5M). BALFX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: BALFX (1.72) vs WEBCX (1.17). BALFX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: BALFX (25 years) vs WEBCX (33 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than BALFX (0.61). BALFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). BALFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: BALFX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). BALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.67 vs. WEBCX (-1.92). BALFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.92 vs. WEBCX (0.28).
| BALFX | WEBCX | BALFX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.603 | 6.850 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266B | 33.5M | 794,030% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 1.17 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.67 | -1.92 | -452% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.44 | 17.31 | 291% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.92 | 0.28 | 15,016% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.26 | -4.08 | -1,846% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement