Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALCX vs WBCCX
BALCX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts BALCX vs WBCCX
American Funds American Balanced C
Price$39.35
Change-$0.49 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
TETON Westwood Balanced C
Price$9.67
Change-$0.07 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.59M
BALCX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALCX vs. WBCCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALCX is a StrongBuy and WBCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. WBCCX (32.6M). BALCX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: BALCX (1.08) vs WBCCX (0.54). BALCX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: BALCX (25 years) vs WBCCX (24 years). WBCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than BALCX (1.31). WBCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. BALCX (44.00). BALCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: BALCX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). BALCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.79 vs. WBCCX (-7.54). BALCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.51 vs. WBCCX (-12.28).
| BALCX | WBCCX | BALCX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 2.14 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 2.14 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.432 | -4.656 | -374% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 269B | 32.6M | 825,153% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.54 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.79 | -7.54 | -130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.91 | 1.76 | 2,318% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.51 | -12.28 | -297% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.83 | -11.94 | -610% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement