BAINF
Price
$1.67
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
CRYBF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

BAINF vs CRYBF

Header iconBAINF vs CRYBF Comparison
Open Charts BAINF vs CRYBFBanner chart's image
Base
Price$1.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$959
CapitalizationN/A
Cryptoblox Technologies
Price$0.11
Change-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Volume$65.95K
CapitalizationN/A
BAINF vs CRYBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAINF vs. CRYBF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAINF is a Hold and CRYBF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (BAINF: $1.67 vs. CRYBF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: BAINF and CRYBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAINF: 272% vs. CRYBF: 195%
Market capitalization -- BAINF: $198.38M vs. CRYBF: $7.51M
BAINF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $198.38M. CRYBF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $7.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAINF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCRYBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAINF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CRYBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRYBF is a better buy in the long-term than BAINF.

Price Growth

BAINF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +26.35% price change this week, while CRYBF (@Packaged Software) price change was +10.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAINF($198M) has a higher market cap than CRYBF($7.51M). CRYBF YTD gains are higher at: 235.212 vs. BAINF (4.437). CRYBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.51M vs. BAINF (-1.79B). BAINF has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. CRYBF (4.22K). CRYBF has less debt than BAINF: CRYBF (53.1K) vs BAINF (500M). BAINF has higher revenues than CRYBF: BAINF (9.75B) vs CRYBF (0).
BAINFCRYBFBAINF / CRYBF
Capitalization198M7.51M2,635%
EBITDA-1.79B-6.51M27,540%
Gain YTD4.437235.2122%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue9.75B0-
Total Cash21.5B4.22K509,720,247%
Total Debt500M53.1K941,620%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRYBF: Fundamental Ratings
CRYBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BAINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAINF has been loosely correlated with INSSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAINF jumps, then INSSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAINF
1D Price
Change %
BAINF100%
N/A
INSSF - BAINF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
DCBO - BAINF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.78%
KNAMF - BAINF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSPI - BAINF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
CRYBF - BAINF
4%
Poorly correlated
-7.72%
More

CRYBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRYBF and CORZ have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRYBF and CORZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRYBF
1D Price
Change %
CRYBF100%
-7.72%
CORZ - CRYBF
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.28%
XROLF - CRYBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
INTZ - CRYBF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
AI - CRYBF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.19%
BAINF - CRYBF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More