BAINF
Price
$2.27
Change
-$0.33 (-12.69%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
307.24M
CRYBF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
7.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAINF vs CRYBF

Header iconBAINF vs CRYBF Comparison
Open Charts BAINF vs CRYBFBanner chart's image
Base
Price$2.27
Change-$0.33 (-12.69%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization307.24M
Dynamite Blockchain
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.24K
Capitalization7.35M
BAINF vs CRYBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRYBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAINF vs. CRYBF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAINF is a Hold and CRYBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BAINF: $2.27 vs. CRYBF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: BAINF and CRYBF are both not notable
BAINF represents the Packaged Software, while CRYBF is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAINF: 32% vs. CRYBF: 2%
Market capitalization -- BAINF: $307.24M vs. CRYBF: $7.35M
BAINF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $307.24M. CRYBF’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $7.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $338.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.1B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAINF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCRYBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAINF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CRYBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRYBF is a better buy in the long-term than BAINF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAINF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRYBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAINF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CRYBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRYBF is a better buy in the short-term than BAINF.

Price Growth

BAINF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -12.69% price change this week, while CRYBF (@Computer Communications) price change was +10.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.79%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.63% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+0.40% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAINF($307M) has a higher market cap than CRYBF($7.36M). BAINF has higher P/E ratio than CRYBF: BAINF (115.63) vs CRYBF (0.01). BAINF YTD gains are higher at: 11.111 vs. CRYBF (-59.039).
BAINFCRYBFBAINF / CRYBF
Capitalization307M7.36M4,174%
EBITDAN/A-5.38M-
Gain YTD11.111-59.039-19%
P/E Ratio115.630.01935,929%
RevenueN/A4.09K-
Total CashN/A2.2K-
Total DebtN/A1.38M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRYBF: Fundamental Ratings
CRYBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAINFCRYBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRYBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DCUCX14.070.12
+0.86%
DWS CROCI US C
JGICX75.220.50
+0.67%
Janus Henderson Growth And Income C
NRACX48.740.27
+0.56%
Neuberger Berman Quality Equity C
FTSAX37.670.10
+0.27%
FullerThaler Behvrl S-M Cor Eq A
FNKCX16.210.03
+0.19%
Frank Value C

BAINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAINF has been loosely correlated with INSSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAINF jumps, then INSSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAINF
1D Price
Change %
BAINF100%
N/A
INSSF - BAINF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DCBO - BAINF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.09%
KNAMF - BAINF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSPI - BAINF
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
CRYBF - BAINF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CRYBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRYBF and CORZ have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRYBF and CORZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRYBF
1D Price
Change %
CRYBF100%
N/A
CORZ - CRYBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
XROLF - CRYBF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INTZ - CRYBF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
AI - CRYBF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.82%
BAINF - CRYBF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More