Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAICX vs RMYCX
BAICX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts BAICX vs RMYCX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Investor A
Price$10.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.57B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.96
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.93M
BAICX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAICX vs. RMYCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAICX is a Hold and RMYCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAICX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. RMYCX (295M). BAICX pays higher dividends than RMYCX: BAICX (5.48) vs RMYCX (4.58). BAICX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: BAICX (18 years) vs RMYCX (10 years). RMYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than BAICX (0.92). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. BAICX (83.00). RMYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAICX: RMYCX (0) vs BAICX (1000). BAICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.96 vs. RMYCX (7.04). BAICX return over 5 years is better than : 27.66 vs. RMYCX (19.79).
| BAICX | RMYCX | BAICX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.75 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.92 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.602 | 11.240 | 85% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 295M | 3,593% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.48 | 4.58 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.96 | 7.04 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.72 | 35.67 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.66 | 19.79 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.05 | 32.20 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers