Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAICX vs RMYCX
BAICX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts BAICX vs RMYCX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Investor A
Price$10.45
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.5B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets289.41M
BAICX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAICX vs. RMYCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAICX is a StrongBuy and RMYCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAICX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. RMYCX (289M). BAICX pays higher dividends than RMYCX: BAICX (5.65) vs RMYCX (4.50). BAICX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: BAICX (17 years) vs RMYCX (10 years). RMYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than BAICX (0.92). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. BAICX (83.00). RMYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAICX: RMYCX (0) vs BAICX (1000). BAICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.37 vs. RMYCX (8.65). RMYCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.27 vs. BAICX (11.13).
| BAICX | RMYCX | BAICX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.75 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.92 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.613 | 6.843 | 97% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 289M | 3,633% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.65 | 4.50 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.37 | 8.65 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.07 | 20.21 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.13 | 16.27 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.96 | 24.72 | 218% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement