Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAICX vs RMYCX
BAICX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts BAICX vs RMYCX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Investor A
Price$10.29
Change-$0.07 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.34B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.55
Change-$0.06 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.08M
BAICX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAICX vs. RMYCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAICX is a StrongBuy and RMYCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAICX has more cash in the bank: 10.3B vs. RMYCX (286M). BAICX pays higher dividends than RMYCX: BAICX (5.74) vs RMYCX (4.60). BAICX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: BAICX (17 years) vs RMYCX (10 years). RMYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than BAICX (0.92). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. BAICX (83.00). RMYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAICX: RMYCX (0) vs BAICX (1000). BAICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.81 vs. RMYCX (7.20). BAICX return over 5 years is better than : 27.67 vs. RMYCX (14.36).
| BAICX | RMYCX | BAICX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.75 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.92 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.465 | 5.096 | 88% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 286M | 3,601% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.74 | 4.60 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.81 | 7.20 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.72 | 20.39 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.67 | 14.36 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.04 | 21.33 | 235% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement