Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAICX vs RMYCX
BAICX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts BAICX vs RMYCX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Investor A
Price$10.47
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.49B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets291.07M
BAICX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAICX vs. RMYCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAICX is a StrongBuy and RMYCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAICX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. RMYCX (291M). BAICX pays higher dividends than RMYCX: BAICX (5.65) vs RMYCX (4.50). BAICX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: BAICX (17 years) vs RMYCX (10 years). RMYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than BAICX (0.92). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. BAICX (83.00). RMYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAICX: RMYCX (0) vs BAICX (1000). BAICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.03 vs. RMYCX (8.87). BAICX return over 5 years is better than : 27.16 vs. RMYCX (15.41).
| BAICX | RMYCX | BAICX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.75 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.92 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.817 | 7.287 | 94% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 291M | 3,608% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.65 | 4.50 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 8.87 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.07 | 20.25 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.16 | 15.41 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.54 | 24.98 | 218% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers