Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFWX vs RGAGX
BAFWX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts BAFWX vs RGAGX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth I
Price$58.04
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.3B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$87.77
Change+$0.34 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.66B
BAFWX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFWX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFWX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. BAFWX (8.3B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than BAFWX: RGAGX (0.59) vs BAFWX (0.00). BAFWX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: BAFWX (13 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). BAFWX (0.61) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). BAFWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFWX: RGAGX (250) vs BAFWX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. BAFWX (2.58). BAFWX return over 5 years is better than : 70.37 vs. RGAGX (49.92).
| BAFWX | RGAGX | BAFWX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.30 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.30 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.317 | 17.733 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.3B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.58 | 13.24 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.57 | 74.37 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.37 | 49.92 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 282.64 | 118.54 | 238% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement