Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFWX vs CGFAX
BAFWX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BAFWX vs CGFAX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth I
Price$57.85
Change+$0.28 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.14B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$86.28
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
BAFWX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFWX vs. CGFAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFWX is a Buy and CGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. BAFWX (8.14B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BAFWX: CGFAX (0.31) vs BAFWX (0.00). BAFWX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BAFWX (13 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). CGFAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than BAFWX (0.61). BAFWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFWX: CGFAX (250) vs BAFWX (1000000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. BAFWX (1.38). BAFWX return over 5 years is better than : 56.83 vs. CGFAX (40.47).
| BAFWX | CGFAX | BAFWX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.65 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.65 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.972 | 17.933 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.14B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.38 | 11.47 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.92 | 72.49 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.83 | 40.47 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 251.92 | 106.22 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement