Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFSX vs WCMLX
BAFSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BAFSX vs WCMLX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Inst
Price$40.11
Change-$5.18 (-11.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets627.64M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
BAFSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAFSX has more cash in the bank: 628M vs. WCMLX (47.1M). BAFSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BAFSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BAFSX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BAFSX (0.96). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BAFSX (28.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFSX: WCMLX (100000) vs BAFSX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. BAFSX (-14.11). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. BAFSX (-33.56).
| BAFSX | WCMLX | BAFSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.99 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.79 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.751 | 6.395 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 628M | 47.1M | 1,333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.11 | 8.52 | -166% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.03 | 19.51 | -46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.56 | -5.30 | 633% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement