Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFSX vs WCMLX
BAFSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BAFSX vs WCMLX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Inst
Price$45.37
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets799.29M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.79
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.09M
BAFSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFSX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAFSX has more cash in the bank: 799M vs. WCMLX (43.1M). BAFSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BAFSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BAFSX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BAFSX (0.97). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BAFSX (28.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFSX: WCMLX (100000) vs BAFSX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.70 vs. BAFSX (-6.63). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.48 vs. BAFSX (-10.69).
| BAFSX | WCMLX | BAFSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.99 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.79 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.666 | 7.232 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 799M | 43.1M | 1,854% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.63 | 1.70 | -391% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.70 | 33.88 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.69 | 12.48 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement