Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFSX vs WCMLX
BAFSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BAFSX vs WCMLX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Inst
Price$40.52
Change+$0.05 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets637.95M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.80
Change+$0.05 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.47M
BAFSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFSX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAFSX has more cash in the bank: 638M vs. WCMLX (47.5M). BAFSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BAFSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BAFSX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BAFSX (0.96). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BAFSX (28.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFSX: WCMLX (100000) vs BAFSX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. BAFSX (-10.73). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -2.44 vs. BAFSX (-31.48).
| BAFSX | WCMLX | BAFSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.99 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.79 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.811 | 7.558 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 638M | 47.5M | 1,343% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.73 | 13.24 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.93 | 29.48 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.48 | -2.44 | 1,291% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement