Advertisement
BAFN vs MBBC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFN is a Buy and MBBC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBBC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BAFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MBBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAFN’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BAFN’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
BAFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.67% price change this week, while MBBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.29%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.38% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BAFN | MBBC | BAFN / MBBC | |
| Capitalization | 53.2M | 19.6M | 271% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.156 | -48.073 | -29% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.74 | 12.48 | 86% |
| Revenue | 73.7M | 7.68M | 960% |
| Total Cash | 4.5M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 11.3M | 5M | 226% |
| BAFN | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLTR | 25.42 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | |||
| UNOV | 35.33 | -0.20 | -0.57% |
| Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF Nov | |||
| ILTB | 48.43 | -0.44 | -0.90% |
| iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF | |||
| VSDA | 50.59 | -0.66 | -1.29% |
| VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF | |||
| SMHX | 28.51 | -0.86 | -2.93% |
| VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF | |||
BAFN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BAFN and COLB have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BAFN and COLB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BAFN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAFN | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| COLB - BAFN | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.34% | ||
| OTPBF - BAFN | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ISTR - BAFN | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.17% | ||
| UBFO - BAFN | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.46% | ||
| MBBC - BAFN | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||
MBBC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MBBC and BAP have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBBC and BAP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBBC | 100% | -0.50% | ||
| BAP - MBBC | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| BAFN - MBBC | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
| CFG - MBBC | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.04% | ||
| FXLG - MBBC | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WAL - MBBC | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.39% | ||
More | ||||