BAFN
Price
$9.51
Change
-$0.05 (-0.52%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
39.31M
CBFV
Price
$31.94
Change
+$0.13 (+0.41%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
159.24M
5 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAFN vs CBFV

Header iconBAFN vs CBFV Comparison
Open Charts BAFN vs CBFVBanner chart's image
BayFirst Financial
Price$9.51
Change-$0.05 (-0.52%)
Volume$2.22K
Capitalization39.31M
CB Financial Services
Price$31.94
Change+$0.13 (+0.41%)
Volume$5.68K
Capitalization159.24M
BAFN vs CBFV Comparison Chart in %
BAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAFN vs. CBFV commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFN is a Hold and CBFV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BAFN: $9.51 vs. CBFV: $31.94)
Brand notoriety: BAFN and CBFV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAFN: 13% vs. CBFV: 48%
Market capitalization -- BAFN: $39.31M vs. CBFV: $159.24M
BAFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $39.31M. CBFV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $159.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCBFV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than BAFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAFN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBFV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAFN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CBFV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than BAFN.

Price Growth

BAFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.06% price change this week, while CBFV (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBFV($159M) has a higher market cap than BAFN($39.3M). CBFV has higher P/E ratio than BAFN: CBFV (14.93) vs BAFN (5.20). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 14.562 vs. BAFN (-27.818). CBFV has less debt than BAFN: CBFV (34.7M) vs BAFN (61.5M). BAFN has higher revenues than CBFV: BAFN (79.6M) vs CBFV (49.3M).
BAFNCBFVBAFN / CBFV
Capitalization39.3M159M25%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-27.81814.562-191%
P/E Ratio5.2014.9335%
Revenue79.6M49.3M161%
Total Cash4.5MN/A-
Total Debt61.5M34.7M177%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAFN vs CBFV: Fundamental Ratings
BAFN
CBFV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8676
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9416
SMR RATING
1..100
5759
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
997
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAFN's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBFV (66) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BAFN (94) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew significantly faster than BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

BAFN's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as CBFV (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAFN’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAFN (63) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BAFN (99) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew significantly faster than BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAFNCBFV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THG171.132.65
+1.57%
Hanover Insurance Group (The)
AESI10.24-0.01
-0.10%
Atlas Energy Solutions
NODK13.50-0.05
-0.37%
NI Holdings
ETN373.30-2.29
-0.61%
Eaton Corp
XLO0.74-0.01
-1.95%
Xilio Therapeutics

BAFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BAFN and COLB have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BAFN and COLB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAFN
1D Price
Change %
BAFN100%
-0.52%
COLB - BAFN
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
BANFP - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBFV - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
BBDO - BAFN
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.27%
PBHC - BAFN
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
More

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
+0.41%
WNEB - CBFV
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
FRAF - CBFV
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
BVFL - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
FUNC - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
MRBK - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
More