BAFN
Price
$9.51
Change
-$0.05 (-0.52%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
39.31M
BANFP
Price
$26.16
Change
+$0.04 (+0.15%)
Updated
Oct 17, 04:56 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAFN vs BANFP

Header iconBAFN vs BANFP Comparison
Open Charts BAFN vs BANFPBanner chart's image
BayFirst Financial
Price$9.51
Change-$0.05 (-0.52%)
Volume$2.22K
Capitalization39.31M
BancFirst
Price$26.16
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
BAFN vs BANFP Comparison Chart in %
BAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BANFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAFN vs. BANFP commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFN is a Hold and BANFP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BAFN: $9.51 vs. BANFP: $26.19)
Brand notoriety: BAFN and BANFP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAFN: 13% vs. BANFP: 304%
Market capitalization -- BAFN: $39.31M vs. BANFP: $0
BAFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $39.31M. BANFP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBANFP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BANFP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAFN is a better buy in the long-term than BANFP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAFN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BANFP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAFN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BANFP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BANFP is a better buy in the short-term than BAFN.

Price Growth

BAFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.06% price change this week, while BANFP (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BANFP YTD gains are higher at: 7.871 vs. BAFN (-27.818).
BAFNBANFPBAFN / BANFP
Capitalization39.3MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-27.8187.871-353%
P/E Ratio5.20N/A-
Revenue79.6MN/A-
Total Cash4.5MN/A-
Total Debt61.5MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAFN vs BANFP: Fundamental Ratings
BAFN
BANFP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
861
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94100
SMR RATING
1..100
57100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BANFP's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BAFN (12). This means that BANFP’s stock grew similarly to BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

BAFN's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as BANFP (100). This means that BAFN’s stock grew similarly to BANFP’s over the last 12 months.

BAFN's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANFP (100). This means that BAFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANFP’s over the last 12 months.

BANFP's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as BAFN (63). This means that BANFP’s stock grew similarly to BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

BAFN's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as BANFP (100). This means that BAFN’s stock grew similarly to BANFP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAFNBANFP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
16%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
8%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BANFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THG171.132.65
+1.57%
Hanover Insurance Group (The)
AESI10.24-0.01
-0.10%
Atlas Energy Solutions
NODK13.50-0.05
-0.37%
NI Holdings
ETN373.30-2.29
-0.61%
Eaton Corp
XLO0.74-0.01
-1.95%
Xilio Therapeutics

BAFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BAFN and COLB have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BAFN and COLB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAFN
1D Price
Change %
BAFN100%
-0.52%
COLB - BAFN
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
BANFP - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBFV - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
BBDO - BAFN
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.27%
PBHC - BAFN
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
More

BANFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BANFP and FITBI have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BANFP and FITBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANFP
1D Price
Change %
BANFP100%
N/A
FITBI - BANFP
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
BAFN - BANFP
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
UVSP - BANFP
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
CASH - BANFP
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
CWBC - BANFP
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
More