Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFHX vs FHJUX
BAFHX vs FHJUX Comparison
Open Charts BAFHX vs FHJUX
Brown Advisory WMC Strat Eurp Eq Instl
Price$18.86
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets708.21M
Fidelity Advisor Europe A
Price$46.22
Change+$0.27 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets927.36M
BAFHX vs FHJUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFHX vs. FHJUX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFHX is a Buy and FHJUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHJUX has more cash in the bank: 927M vs. BAFHX (708M). FHJUX pays higher dividends than BAFHX: FHJUX (2.24) vs BAFHX (1.48). BAFHX was incepted earlier than FHJUX: BAFHX (12 years) vs FHJUX (12 years). BAFHX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FHJUX (0.92). BAFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FHJUX (31.00). FHJUX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFHX: FHJUX (0) vs BAFHX (1000000). BAFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.52 vs. FHJUX (28.41). BAFHX return over 5 years is better than : 60.43 vs. FHJUX (19.84).
| BAFHX | FHJUX | BAFHX / FHJUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.92 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.92 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.545 | 31.585 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 708M | 927M | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 2.24 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.52 | 28.41 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.58 | 51.36 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.43 | 19.84 | 305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.70 | 35.14 | 281% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement