Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFHX vs FHJUX
BAFHX vs FHJUX Comparison
Open Charts BAFHX vs FHJUX
Brown Advisory WMC Strat Eurp Eq Instl
Price$19.08
Change+$0.57 (+3.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets750.87M
Fidelity Advisor Europe A
Price$49.05
Change+$2.75 (+5.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
BAFHX vs FHJUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFHX vs. FHJUX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFHX is a Buy and FHJUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHJUX has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. BAFHX (751M). FHJUX pays higher dividends than BAFHX: FHJUX (1.82) vs BAFHX (1.33). BAFHX was incepted earlier than FHJUX: BAFHX (12 years) vs FHJUX (12 years). FHJUX (1.07) and BAFHX (1.05) have similar cost to investors . FHJUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. BAFHX (47.00). FHJUX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFHX: FHJUX (0) vs BAFHX (1000000). BAFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.96 vs. FHJUX (36.78). BAFHX return over 5 years is better than : 70.58 vs. FHJUX (24.36).
| BAFHX | FHJUX | BAFHX / FHJUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.07 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.07 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.533 | 5.182 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 751M | 1.03B | 73% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.82 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.96 | 36.78 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.88 | 57.01 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.58 | 24.36 | 290% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.05 | 67.01 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement