Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFGX vs CGFAX
BAFGX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BAFGX vs CGFAX
Brown Advisory Growth Equity Inst
Price$18.70
Change+$0.15 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.87M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$85.15
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
BAFGX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFGX vs. CGFAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFGX is a Buy and CGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. BAFGX (562M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BAFGX: CGFAX (0.32) vs BAFGX (0.00). BAFGX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BAFGX (13 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). BAFGX (0.69) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). BAFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFGX: CGFAX (250) vs BAFGX (1000000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. BAFGX (-38.41). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.66 vs. BAFGX (-42.76).
| BAFGX | CGFAX | BAFGX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.65 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.65 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.793 | 15.760 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 562M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -38.41 | 18.35 | -209% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.61 | 60.35 | -37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.76 | 42.66 | -100% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.78 | 105.34 | -6% |