Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFGX vs CGFAX
BAFGX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BAFGX vs CGFAX
Brown Advisory Growth Equity Inst
Price$18.59
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets577.6M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
BAFGX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFGX vs. CGFAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFGX is a Buy and CGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. BAFGX (578M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BAFGX: CGFAX (0.32) vs BAFGX (0.00). BAFGX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BAFGX (13 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). BAFGX (0.69) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). BAFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFGX: CGFAX (250) vs BAFGX (1000000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. BAFGX (-38.22). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.65 vs. BAFGX (-41.36).
| BAFGX | CGFAX | BAFGX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.65 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.65 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.024 | 14.270 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 578M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -38.22 | 14.57 | -262% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.13 | 42.81 | -75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.36 | 44.65 | -93% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.84 | 92.49 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement