Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAEIX vs RMFCX
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BAEIX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income A
Price$17.47
Change+$0.19 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets831.35M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.96
Change+$0.31 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAEIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. BAEIX (831M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BAEIX: RMFCX (1.18) vs BAEIX (0.99). BAEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BAEIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). BAEIX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BAEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.82 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAEIX: RMFCX (250) vs BAEIX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.82 vs. BAEIX (-22.20). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.87 vs. BAEIX (-17.81).
| BAEIX | RMFCX | BAEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.882 | 16.369 | -115% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 831M | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.18 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.20 | 8.82 | -252% |
| Returns for 3 years | -31.06 | 30.01 | -104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.81 | 54.87 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.68 | 97.71 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement