Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAEIX vs RMFCX
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BAEIX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income A
Price$21.78
Change+$0.15 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAEIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. BAEIX (1.03B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BAEIX: RMFCX (1.20) vs BAEIX (0.97). BAEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BAEIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BAEIX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BAEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.82 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAEIX: RMFCX (250) vs BAEIX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. BAEIX (-23.05). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. BAEIX (11.96).
| BAEIX | RMFCX | BAEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.131 | 13.689 | 8% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.20 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.05 | 4.96 | -465% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.94 | 38.79 | -28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.96 | 57.10 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.68 | 91.18 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement