Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAEIX vs RMFCX
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BAEIX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income A
Price$22.10
Change+$0.11 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.2B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.41
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAEIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. BAEIX (1.2B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BAEIX: RMFCX (1.27) vs BAEIX (1.05). BAEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BAEIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BAEIX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BAEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.82 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAEIX: RMFCX (250) vs BAEIX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.38 vs. BAEIX (-18.46). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.49 vs. BAEIX (20.69).
| BAEIX | RMFCX | BAEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.374 | 11.347 | 21% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.27 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.46 | 11.38 | -162% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.58 | 30.87 | -41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.69 | 60.49 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.57 | 81.82 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement