Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACIX vs FSENX
BACIX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACIX vs. FSENX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACIX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. BACIX (267M). BACIX pays higher dividends than FSENX: BACIX (2.60) vs FSENX (1.93). BACIX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACIX (21 years) vs FSENX (44 years). BACIX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSENX (15.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACIX: FSENX (0) vs BACIX (2000000). BACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.25 vs. FSENX (-4.44). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 183.40 vs. BACIX (138.13).
| BACIX | FSENX | BACIX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.65 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.65 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.377 | 1.919 | 228% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267M | 1.81B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.60 | 1.93 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.25 | -4.44 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.80 | 22.51 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 138.13 | 183.40 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.83 | 60.22 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement