Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACIX vs FNRCX
BACIX vs FNRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACIX vs. FNRCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACIX is a Buy and FNRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNRCX has more cash in the bank: 952M vs. BACIX (278M). BACIX pays higher dividends than FNRCX: BACIX (2.52) vs FNRCX (0.71). BACIX was incepted earlier than FNRCX: BACIX (21 years) vs FNRCX (28 years). FNRCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than BACIX (1.07). BACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FNRCX (31.00). FNRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACIX: FNRCX (0) vs BACIX (2000000). BACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.75 vs. FNRCX (11.05). FNRCX return over 5 years is better than : 264.44 vs. BACIX (209.20).
| BACIX | FNRCX | BACIX / FNRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.73 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.73 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.589 | 10.671 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 278M | 952M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.52 | 0.71 | 353% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.75 | 11.05 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.85 | 43.76 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 209.20 | 264.44 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.50 | 91.92 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement