Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACIX vs FNARX
BACIX vs FNARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACIX vs. FNARX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACIX is a Buy and FNARX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 690M vs. BACIX (274M). BACIX pays higher dividends than FNARX: BACIX (2.47) vs FNARX (1.31). BACIX was incepted earlier than FNARX: BACIX (21 years) vs FNARX (29 years). BACIX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX (68.00) and BACIX (66.00) have comparable annual turnover. FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACIX: FNARX (0) vs BACIX (2000000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.87 vs. BACIX (5.27). FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 175.25 vs. BACIX (134.07).
| BACIX | FNARX | BACIX / FNARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.69 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.69 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.120 | 29.365 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274M | 690M | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 1.31 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.27 | 18.87 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.19 | 37.77 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 134.07 | 175.25 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.05 | 126.29 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers