BACHY
Price
$13.91
Change
+$0.05 (+0.36%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
230.82B
53 days until earnings call
FANDF
Price
$4.21
Change
-$0.02 (-0.47%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
23.17B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BACHY vs FANDF

Header iconBACHY vs FANDF Comparison
Open Charts BACHY vs FANDFBanner chart's image
Bank of China
Price$13.91
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
Volume$47.61K
Capitalization230.82B
Firstrand
Price$4.21
Change-$0.02 (-0.47%)
Volume$146
Capitalization23.17B
BACHY vs FANDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BACHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BACHY vs. FANDF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACHY is a StrongBuy and FANDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BACHY: $13.91 vs. FANDF: $4.22)
Brand notoriety: BACHY and FANDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BACHY: 92% vs. FANDF: 18%
Market capitalization -- BACHY: $230.82B vs. FANDF: $23.17B
BACHY [@Major Banks] is valued at $230.82B. FANDF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $23.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BACHY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFANDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BACHY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FANDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BACHY is a better buy in the long-term than FANDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BACHY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FANDF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BACHY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FANDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BACHY is a better buy in the short-term than FANDF.

Price Growth

BACHY (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.64% price change this week, while FANDF (@Major Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

BACHY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BACHY($231B) has a higher market cap than FANDF($23.2B). FANDF has higher P/E ratio than BACHY: FANDF (10.50) vs BACHY (5.30). BACHY YTD gains are higher at: 17.573 vs. FANDF (5.375). FANDF has less debt than BACHY: FANDF (21.6B) vs BACHY (2.39T). BACHY has higher revenues than FANDF: BACHY (633B) vs FANDF (143B).
BACHYFANDFBACHY / FANDF
Capitalization231B23.2B996%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.5735.375327%
P/E Ratio5.3010.5050%
Revenue633B143B443%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.39T21.6B11,056%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BACHY vs FANDF: Fundamental Ratings
BACHY
FANDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
538
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5659
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2678
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FANDF's Valuation (86) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (91). This means that FANDF’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.

BACHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANDF (38). This means that BACHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (1). This means that BACHY’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHY's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (59). This means that BACHY’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHY's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANDF (78). This means that BACHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACHYFANDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
30%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BACHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBT26.830.33
+1.25%
Beacon Financial Corporation
LOBO0.53N/A
+0.55%
LOBO EV TECHNOLOGIES Ltd
WWD242.85-1.74
-0.71%
Woodward
UNTY52.24-0.59
-1.12%
Unity Bancorp
HNNA12.16-0.29
-2.33%
Hennessy Advisors

BACHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BACHY has been closely correlated with CICHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BACHY jumps, then CICHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACHY
1D Price
Change %
BACHY100%
+0.36%
CICHY - BACHY
82%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
IDCBY - BACHY
81%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
ACGBY - BACHY
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
MBFJF - BACHY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
SCBFY - BACHY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
More

FANDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FANDF and BACHY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FANDF and BACHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANDF
1D Price
Change %
FANDF100%
N/A
BACHY - FANDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
FANDY - FANDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMWAY - FANDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
CICHY - FANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
BNDSY - FANDF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.57%
More