BACHF
Price
$0.55
Change
+$0.02 (+3.77%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
220.33B
SMFNF
Price
$27.52
Change
-$0.54 (-1.92%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
108.92B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BACHF vs SMFNF

Header iconBACHF vs SMFNF Comparison
Open Charts BACHF vs SMFNFBanner chart's image
Bank of China
Price$0.55
Change+$0.02 (+3.77%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization220.33B
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$27.52
Change-$0.54 (-1.92%)
Volume$9.22K
Capitalization108.92B
BACHF vs SMFNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BACHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BACHF vs. SMFNF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACHF is a Hold and SMFNF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BACHF: $0.55 vs. SMFNF: $27.52)
Brand notoriety: BACHF and SMFNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BACHF: 37% vs. SMFNF: 17%
Market capitalization -- BACHF: $220.33B vs. SMFNF: $108.92B
BACHF [@Major Banks] is valued at $220.33B. SMFNF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $108.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $869.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $136.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BACHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFNF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BACHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMFNF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMFNF is a better buy in the long-term than BACHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BACHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFNF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BACHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SMFNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMFNF is a better buy in the short-term than BACHF.

Price Growth

BACHF (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.44% price change this week, while SMFNF (@Major Banks) price change was -1.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +130.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.79% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BACHF($220B) has a higher market cap than SMFNF($109B). SMFNF has higher P/E ratio than BACHF: SMFNF (13.44) vs BACHF (5.25). SMFNF YTD gains are higher at: 21.792 vs. BACHF (16.762). BACHF has less debt than SMFNF: BACHF (2.67T) vs SMFNF (31.54T). SMFNF has higher revenues than BACHF: SMFNF (5.11T) vs BACHF (641B).
BACHFSMFNFBACHF / SMFNF
Capitalization220B109B202%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.76221.79277%
P/E Ratio5.2513.4439%
Revenue641B5.11T13%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.67T31.54T8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BACHF vs SMFNF: Fundamental Ratings
BACHF
SMFNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2623
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
354
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMFNF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (91). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (26). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFNF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (1). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFNF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (59). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFNF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (35). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACHFSMFNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BACHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GWAYF0.140.01
+6.57%
Greenway Greenhouse Cannabis Corporation
EHGRF0.08N/A
N/A
Star Entertainment Group Limited
HTSUF29.00N/A
N/A
Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
WEIGF35.00N/A
N/A
Weir Group PLC
EMCUF12.80N/A
N/A
EMBRACE CHANGE ACQUISITION CORP.

BACHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BACHF and SAN have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BACHF and SAN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACHF
1D Price
Change %
BACHF100%
N/A
SAN - BACHF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
SMFNF - BACHF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
ACGBY - BACHF
19%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
BACHY - BACHF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
BCMXY - BACHF
13%
Poorly correlated
-6.92%
More

SMFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMFNF and SMFG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMFNF and SMFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFNF
1D Price
Change %
SMFNF100%
-1.92%
SMFG - SMFNF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
CMWAY - SMFNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
BACHF - SMFNF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBCYF - SMFNF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
MUFG - SMFNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
More