BACHF
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.03 (-5.36%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
230.82B
SMFNF
Price
$27.55
Change
+$0.05 (+0.18%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
105.89B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BACHF vs SMFNF

Header iconBACHF vs SMFNF Comparison
Open Charts BACHF vs SMFNFBanner chart's image
Bank of China
Price$0.53
Change-$0.03 (-5.36%)
Volume$3.88K
Capitalization230.82B
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$27.55
Change+$0.05 (+0.18%)
Volume$7.8K
Capitalization105.89B
BACHF vs SMFNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BACHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BACHF vs. SMFNF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACHF is a Buy and SMFNF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BACHF: $0.53 vs. SMFNF: $27.55)
Brand notoriety: BACHF and SMFNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BACHF: 24% vs. SMFNF: 14%
Market capitalization -- BACHF: $230.82B vs. SMFNF: $105.89B
BACHF [@Major Banks] is valued at $230.82B. SMFNF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $105.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BACHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFNF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BACHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMFNF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMFNF is a better buy in the long-term than BACHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BACHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFNF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BACHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SMFNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMFNF is a better buy in the short-term than BACHF.

Price Growth

BACHF (@Major Banks) experienced а -3.84% price change this week, while SMFNF (@Major Banks) price change was +2.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BACHF($231B) has a higher market cap than SMFNF($106B). SMFNF has higher P/E ratio than BACHF: SMFNF (13.39) vs BACHF (5.04). SMFNF YTD gains are higher at: 21.903 vs. BACHF (11.795). BACHF has less debt than SMFNF: BACHF (2.39T) vs SMFNF (31.54T). SMFNF has higher revenues than BACHF: SMFNF (5.11T) vs BACHF (633B).
BACHFSMFNFBACHF / SMFNF
Capitalization231B106B218%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.79521.90354%
P/E Ratio5.0413.3938%
Revenue633B5.11T12%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.39T31.54T8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BACHF vs SMFNF: Fundamental Ratings
BACHF
SMFNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2822
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3533
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMFNF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (91). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (28). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFNF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (1). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFNF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (62). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFNF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (35). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACHFSMFNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BACHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LENZ41.982.06
+5.16%
LENZ Therapeutics
TFX130.701.61
+1.25%
Teleflex
OACC10.450.01
+0.10%
Oaktree Acquisition Corp. III Life Sciences
BN66.51-0.05
-0.08%
Brookfield Corp
KLXE1.89-0.06
-3.08%
KLX Energy Services Holdings

BACHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BACHF and SAN have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BACHF and SAN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACHF
1D Price
Change %
BACHF100%
-5.55%
SAN - BACHF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
SMFNF - BACHF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
ACGBY - BACHF
19%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
BACHY - BACHF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
BCMXY - BACHF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
More

SMFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMFNF and SMFG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMFNF and SMFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFNF
1D Price
Change %
SMFNF100%
+0.18%
SMFG - SMFNF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
CMWAY - SMFNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
BACHF - SMFNF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.55%
HBCYF - SMFNF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
MUFG - SMFNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
More