BACHF
Price
$0.47
Change
+$0.02 (+4.44%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
SAN
Price
$4.70
Change
+$0.06 (+1.29%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
82 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BACHF vs SAN

Header iconBACHF vs SAN Comparison
Open Charts BACHF vs SANBanner chart's image
Bank of China
Price$0.47
Change+$0.02 (+4.44%)
Volume$12.6K
CapitalizationN/A
Banco Santander SA
Price$4.70
Change+$0.06 (+1.29%)
Volume$3.08M
CapitalizationN/A
BACHF vs SAN Comparison Chart
Loading...
SAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BACHF vs. SAN commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACHF is a Hold and SAN is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (BACHF: $0.47 vs. SAN: $4.70)
Brand notoriety: BACHF and SAN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BACHF: 9% vs. SAN: 110%
Market capitalization -- BACHF: $146.84B vs. SAN: $76.74B
BACHF [@Major Banks] is valued at $146.84B. SAN’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $76.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BACHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BACHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SAN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BACHF and SAN are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SAN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BACHF (@Major Banks) experienced а -2.28% price change this week, while SAN (@Major Banks) price change was -3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-1.38% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BACHF($147B) has a higher market cap than SAN($76.7B). SAN has higher P/E ratio than BACHF: SAN (6.83) vs BACHF (3.61). BACHF YTD gains are higher at: 24.855 vs. SAN (21.328). SAN has less debt than BACHF: SAN (311B) vs BACHF (1.77T). BACHF has higher revenues than SAN: BACHF (635B) vs SAN (59.9B).
BACHFSANBACHF / SAN
Capitalization147B76.7B192%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.85521.328117%
P/E Ratio3.616.8353%
Revenue635B59.9B1,060%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.77T311B569%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BACHF vs SAN: Fundamental Ratings
BACHF
SAN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1367
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5750
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5954
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4666
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BACHF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as SAN (16) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BACHF (57) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SAN (2) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BACHF (59) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SAN (66) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SAN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BACHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BACHF and SAN have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BACHF and SAN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACHF
1D Price
Change %
BACHF100%
+5.43%
SAN - BACHF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
SMFNF - BACHF
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.48%
ACGBY - BACHF
19%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
BACHY - BACHF
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
BCMXY - BACHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAN
1D Price
Change %
SAN100%
+1.29%
BBVA - SAN
73%
Closely correlated
+2.14%
ING - SAN
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
BCS - SAN
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
AAVMY - SAN
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
HSBC - SAN
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
More