Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FSENX
BACCX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FSENX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Buy and FSENX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. BACCX (267M). FSENX pays higher dividends than BACCX: FSENX (1.93) vs BACCX (1.71). BACCX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACCX (21 years) vs FSENX (44 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSENX (15.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FSENX (0) vs BACCX (1000). BACCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.32 vs. FSENX (-4.44). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 183.40 vs. BACCX (125.42).
| BACCX | FSENX | BACCX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.65 | 314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.65 | 323% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.673 | 1.919 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267M | 1.81B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.93 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.32 | -4.44 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.82 | 22.51 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 125.42 | 183.40 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.50 | 60.22 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement