Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FNARX
BACCX vs FNARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FNARX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a StrongBuy and FNARX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 690M vs. BACCX (268M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FNARX: BACCX (1.63) vs FNARX (1.31). BACCX was incepted earlier than FNARX: BACCX (21 years) vs FNARX (29 years). BACCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX (68.00) and BACCX (66.00) have comparable annual turnover. FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FNARX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.96 vs. BACCX (9.31). FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 179.37 vs. BACCX (125.78).
| BACCX | FNARX | BACCX / FNARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.69 | 291% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.69 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.639 | 28.835 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268M | 690M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.31 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.31 | 28.96 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.92 | 42.88 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 125.78 | 179.37 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.93 | 142.55 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers