Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FNARX
BACCX vs FNARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FNARX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FNARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 826M vs. BACCX (307M). FNARX pays higher dividends than BACCX: FNARX (1.69) vs BACCX (1.60). BACCX was incepted earlier than FNARX: BACCX (21 years) vs FNARX (29 years). BACCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX (68.00) and BACCX (66.00) have comparable annual turnover. FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FNARX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.87 vs. BACCX (23.33). FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 196.75 vs. BACCX (150.12).
| BACCX | FNARX | BACCX / FNARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.69 | 291% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.69 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.711 | 11.007 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307M | 826M | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.69 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.33 | 39.87 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.65 | 53.40 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 150.12 | 196.75 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.62 | 202.90 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement