Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FIKAX
BACCX vs FIKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FIKAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Buy and FIKAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. BACCX (267M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FIKAX: BACCX (1.71) vs FIKAX (1.00). BACCX was incepted earlier than FIKAX: BACCX (21 years) vs FIKAX (7 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FIKAX (31.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FIKAX (0) vs BACCX (1000). BACCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.32 vs. FIKAX (-4.40). FIKAX return over 5 years is better than : 183.75 vs. BACCX (125.42).
| BACCX | FIKAX | BACCX / FIKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.58 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.58 | 362% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.673 | 1.974 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267M | 942M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.00 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.32 | -4.40 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.82 | 23.03 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 125.42 | 183.75 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement