Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FIKAX
BACCX vs FIKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FIKAX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Buy and FIKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 931M vs. BACCX (271M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FIKAX: BACCX (1.64) vs FIKAX (1.03). BACCX was incepted earlier than FIKAX: BACCX (20 years) vs FIKAX (7 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FIKAX (31.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FIKAX (0) vs BACCX (1000). BACCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.34 vs. FIKAX (-4.38). FIKAX return over 5 years is better than : 197.58 vs. BACCX (132.74).
| BACCX | FIKAX | BACCX / FIKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.58 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.58 | 362% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.482 | 3.583 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 271M | 931M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 1.03 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.34 | -4.38 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.45 | 31.30 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 132.74 | 197.58 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement