Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FANAX
BACCX vs FANAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FANAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FANAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANAX has more cash in the bank: 952M vs. BACCX (273M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FANAX: BACCX (1.65) vs FANAX (0.88). BACCX was incepted earlier than FANAX: BACCX (21 years) vs FANAX (29 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FANAX (0.98). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FANAX (31.00). FANAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FANAX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FANAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.98 vs. BACCX (3.31). FANAX return over 5 years is better than : 215.69 vs. BACCX (146.70).
| BACCX | FANAX | BACCX / FANAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.98 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.98 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.968 | 5.421 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 273M | 952M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.88 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.31 | 4.98 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.31 | 21.96 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 146.70 | 215.69 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.94 | 73.58 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement