Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FAGNX
BACCX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FAGNX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FAGNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 952M vs. BACCX (273M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: BACCX (1.65) vs FAGNX (0.75). BACCX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: BACCX (21 years) vs FAGNX (38 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FAGNX (31.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FAGNX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FAGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.70 vs. BACCX (3.31). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 211.76 vs. BACCX (146.70).
| BACCX | FAGNX | BACCX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 1.23 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.23 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.968 | 5.226 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 273M | 952M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.75 | 222% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.31 | 4.70 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.31 | 21.04 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 146.70 | 211.76 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.94 | 71.81 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement