Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACAX vs FSENX
BACAX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACAX vs. FSENX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACAX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. BACAX (262M). BACAX pays higher dividends than FSENX: BACAX (2.21) vs FSENX (1.85). BACAX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACAX (21 years) vs FSENX (44 years). BACAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSENX (15.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACAX: FSENX (0) vs BACAX (1000). BACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.59 vs. FSENX (0.40). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 258.42 vs. BACAX (189.63).
| BACAX | FSENX | BACAX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.65 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.509 | 4.601 | 120% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 262M | 1.81B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 1.85 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.59 | 0.40 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.17 | 17.03 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 189.63 | 258.42 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.62 | 65.82 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement