Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACAX vs FSENX
BACAX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACAX vs. FSENX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACAX is a StrongBuy and FSENX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.77B vs. BACAX (273M). BACAX pays higher dividends than FSENX: BACAX (2.23) vs FSENX (1.87). BACAX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACAX (21 years) vs FSENX (44 years). BACAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSENX (15.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACAX: FSENX (0) vs BACAX (1000). BACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.85 vs. FSENX (2.86). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 232.55 vs. BACAX (168.66).
| BACAX | FSENX | BACAX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.65 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.589 | 9.365 | 113% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 273M | 1.77B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 1.87 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.85 | 2.86 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.00 | 8.23 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 168.66 | 232.55 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.66 | 72.95 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers