Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACAX vs FNARX
BACAX vs FNARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACAX vs. FNARX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACAX is a Hold and FNARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 707M vs. BACAX (277M). BACAX pays higher dividends than FNARX: BACAX (2.47) vs FNARX (1.89). BACAX was incepted earlier than FNARX: BACAX (21 years) vs FNARX (29 years). BACAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX (68.00) and BACAX (66.00) have comparable annual turnover. FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACAX: FNARX (0) vs BACAX (1000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.21 vs. BACAX (10.51). FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 180.47 vs. BACAX (129.49).
| BACAX | FNARX | BACAX / FNARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.69 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.69 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.237 | 7.408 | 71% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 277M | 707M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 1.89 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | 33.21 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.11 | 45.41 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 129.49 | 180.47 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.48 | 203.71 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement