Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACAX vs FIKAX
BACAX vs FIKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACAX vs. FIKAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACAX is a Buy and FIKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 931M vs. BACAX (278M). BACAX pays higher dividends than FIKAX: BACAX (2.20) vs FIKAX (1.03). BACAX was incepted earlier than FIKAX: BACAX (20 years) vs FIKAX (7 years). BACAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). BACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FIKAX (31.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACAX: FIKAX (0) vs BACAX (1000). BACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.80 vs. FIKAX (-3.93). FIKAX return over 5 years is better than : 202.32 vs. BACAX (143.95).
| BACAX | FIKAX | BACAX / FIKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.58 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.58 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.800 | 3.905 | 149% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 278M | 931M | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 1.03 | 213% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.80 | -3.93 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.27 | 32.70 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 143.95 | 202.32 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement