Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACAX vs FIKAX
BACAX vs FIKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACAX vs. FIKAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACAX is a Hold and FIKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. BACAX (267M). BACAX pays higher dividends than FIKAX: BACAX (2.28) vs FIKAX (1.00). BACAX was incepted earlier than FIKAX: BACAX (21 years) vs FIKAX (7 years). BACAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). BACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FIKAX (31.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACAX: FIKAX (0) vs BACAX (1000). BACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.68 vs. FIKAX (-4.40). FIKAX return over 5 years is better than : 183.75 vs. BACAX (133.45).
| BACAX | FIKAX | BACAX / FIKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.58 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.58 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.102 | 1.974 | 208% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267M | 942M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.28 | 1.00 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.68 | -4.40 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.30 | 23.03 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 133.45 | 183.75 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement