BAC
Price
$52.48
Change
-$2.06 (-3.78%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
378.51B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WFC
Price
$89.25
Change
-$4.31 (-4.61%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
276.01B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAC vs WFC

Header iconBAC vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts BAC vs WFCBanner chart's image
Bank of America
Price$52.48
Change-$2.06 (-3.78%)
Volume$84.75M
Capitalization378.51B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$89.25
Change-$4.31 (-4.61%)
Volume$33.8M
Capitalization276.01B
BAC vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAC vs. WFC commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a Hold and WFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (BAC: $52.48 vs. WFC: $89.25)
Brand notoriety: BAC and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 229% vs. WFC: 243%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $378.51B vs. WFC: $276.01B
BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $378.51B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $276.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $830.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $145.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the long-term than BAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAC is a better buy in the short-term than WFC.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а -5.68% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was -5.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2026.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.58% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAC($379B) has a higher market cap than WFC($276B). WFC (14.26) and BAC (13.77) have similar P/E ratio . WFC YTD gains are higher at: -4.238 vs. BAC (-4.582). WFC has more cash in the bank: 34.8B vs. BAC (25.4B). WFC has less debt than BAC: WFC (214B) vs BAC (366B). BAC has higher revenues than WFC: BAC (107B) vs WFC (82.8B).
BACWFCBAC / WFC
Capitalization379B276B137%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.582-4.238108%
P/E Ratio13.7714.2697%
Revenue107B82.8B129%
Total Cash25.4B34.8B73%
Total Debt366B214B171%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6983
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
359
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2619
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6546
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAC's Valuation (74) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (78). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (35). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Price Growth Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (26). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (65). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEAF12.21N/A
N/A
Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund
IBIB25.32N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term TIPS ETF
XIJN30.88-0.01
-0.03%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Bffr & Prm Inc ETF -June
BUFZ26.61-0.04
-0.15%
FT Vest Laddered Moderate Bffr ETF
SMH388.35-3.18
-0.81%
VanEck Semiconductor ETF

BAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAC
1D Price
Change %
BAC100%
-3.78%
WFC - BAC
85%
Closely correlated
-4.61%
C - BAC
84%
Closely correlated
-3.34%
JPM - BAC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
BK - BAC
72%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
EWBC - BAC
68%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
-4.61%
BAC - WFC
84%
Closely correlated
-3.78%
C - WFC
81%
Closely correlated
-3.34%
JPM - WFC
75%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
BK - WFC
72%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
EWBC - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
More