BAC
Price
$39.69
Change
+$0.11 (+0.28%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
299.21B
79 days until earnings call
WFC
Price
$69.71
Change
-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Updated
Apr 28, 11:13 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
203.96B
78 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAC vs WFC

Header iconBAC vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts BAC vs WFCBanner chart's image
Bank of America
Price$39.69
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
Volume$32.69M
Capitalization299.21B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$69.71
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Volume$33.16K
Capitalization203.96B
BAC vs WFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAC vs. WFC commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a Buy and WFC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BAC: $39.69 vs. WFC: $69.73)
Brand notoriety: BAC and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 61% vs. WFC: 91%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $299.21B vs. WFC: $203.96B
BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $299.21B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $203.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAC and WFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BAC and WFC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а +6.09% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +7.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +70.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.56% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAC($299B) has a higher market cap than WFC($204B). BAC (12.18) and WFC (11.93) have similar P/E ratio . WFC YTD gains are higher at: -0.236 vs. BAC (-9.123). WFC has more cash in the bank: 33B vs. BAC (25.3B). WFC has less debt than BAC: WFC (219B) vs BAC (334B). BAC has higher revenues than WFC: BAC (98.6B) vs WFC (82.6B).
BACWFCBAC / WFC
Capitalization299B204B147%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-9.123-0.2363,867%
P/E Ratio12.1811.93102%
Revenue98.6B82.6B119%
Total Cash25.3B33B77%
Total Debt334B219B153%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1817
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4116
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6259
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5851
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAC's Valuation (68) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (71). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (41). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (62). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (58). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA284.9525.44
+9.80%
Tesla
GME27.460.38
+1.40%
GameStop Corp
SPY550.643.95
+0.72%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL209.280.91
+0.44%
Apple
BTC.X93754.840000-892.085940
-0.94%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

BAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with C. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then C could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAC
1D Price
Change %
BAC100%
+0.28%
C - BAC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
WFC - BAC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
JPM - BAC
80%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
NTB - BAC
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
BCS - BAC
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
+0.24%
BAC - WFC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
C - WFC
80%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
JPM - WFC
79%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
BCS - WFC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
NTB - WFC
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
More